sockeyed
Well-known
J-3 on a Bessa R3M, Fuji Acros:



I'm going to miss my J3 that I just sold but at least I know that it will be in capable hands. 🙂
What else? Uncoated prewar CZ Sonnar? New ZM Zeiss/Cosina? Old Leotax Simlar? Nikon 1.5 or 1.4 from fifties? Yes, they are similar, but different etc. In my opinion Canon/Serenar 1.5 is the best (and best made) version, better than Nikon 1.4 (which is sharper wide open, but flat and poor performer for distance shots). Canon might be even better than the original CZ - though I have not tried the last Stuttgart versions...
Those 3 are J3 shots on M8, of course.
that middle shot is so 3D !
1955 J-3, wide-open at F1.5. Kodacolor 800 film.
Raid- this is not a plot to make you feel bad selling THAT J-3...
Has the 50-ies J3 the same optics / coating as a late 70-ies J3?
I would like to try one, I saw one in good shape on the great bay....
perhaps I put an ad in the WTB section
I am not quite agree that `late` J-3s are soft. My samples above are from ZOMZ 1971 sample and it focuses precisely on M3 (no adjustment - I am lucky guy). This lens is quite sharp on F/1.5
But recently I got J-3 of KMZ1954 and it has more contrast wide-open. Perhaps not pretty good sample... but:
![]()
Wideopen (or F/1.8) J-3 of 1954 on Zorki-1 (made in 1954). Strange artefact to the left is casette light leak.
I've had good luck with the J-3's from the 60s and 70s. I've shot with several from the 80s that were soft until stopped down to F4.
The coatings changed over the years, and by the specific vendor. I've seen reference to the formula being recomputed in the mid-1950s as different glass was used. My 1953 J-3 appears to have higher contrast than the 1960s lens.
Raid- the one that you had was "really good". It was early 60s, as I recall. And it was the first one that I worked on.