furcafe
Veteran
http://www.flickr.com/photos/furcafe/tags/carlzeiss5015csonnarsmount2008/
I have the Nikon RF version, which is optimized for f/1.5.
I have the Nikon RF version, which is optimized for f/1.5.
Can we see more photos from the C-Sonnar?![]()
back alley
IMAGES
back alley
IMAGES
back alley
IMAGES
back alley
IMAGES
back alley
IMAGES
back alley
IMAGES
MCTuomey
Veteran
i'm with you, sug. it's about the end result.
joe and dubneg, beautiful stuff there
joe and dubneg, beautiful stuff there
back alley
IMAGES
i'm with you, sug. it's about the end result.
joe and dubneg, beautiful stuff there
thanks!
.
DNG
Film Friendly
philosomatographer
Well-known
The focus shift is real and very big. The lens is unusable as an f1.5 or f2 unless you're willing to guess how much to offset the focus, or lean inward, or whatever other workaround people have come up with. I hate stuff like that; I get frustrated by things that do not "just work flawlessly with no guessing" so I will not bother using it wider than f2.8. At 2.8 it is very sharp and accurately focused. Same for all the apertures smaller than f2.8 but f2 and f1.5 are both way off.
Chris, I think the Sonnar is an odd choice for a lens to be used stopped down - the ZM Planar 50/2.0 is a technically superior lens in all respects if you are looking for high resolution (especially stopped down) and lack of focus shift.
Still, I wish you great enjoyment with this lens, but it remains, for your needs, an odd choice in my opinion...
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
Thanks guys for sharing your great shots with the Sonnar. Creamy bokeh of Sonnar is definitely my favorite, probably more than Plannar which can be a bit too "dramatic" but I'm also digging the whole gentle, classy atmosphere this lens shows. I can't afford one right now, but seeing your photos made me take out my Nikkor-HC 50/2. This is my favorite portrait lens.
Sonnar and Tessar are, personally, type of lenses that reminds me "good lens" is not all about sharpness, speed, highly corrected look or other technical details modern lens designs got. (or of course whether it FS or not.)
As Mike said, it's about the end result, and I'm loving what I'm seeing.
Sonnar and Tessar are, personally, type of lenses that reminds me "good lens" is not all about sharpness, speed, highly corrected look or other technical details modern lens designs got. (or of course whether it FS or not.)
As Mike said, it's about the end result, and I'm loving what I'm seeing.
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
Chris, I think the Sonnar is an odd choice for a lens to be used stopped down - the ZM Planar 50/2.0 is a technically superior lens in all respects if you are looking for high resolution (especially stopped down) and lack of focus shift.
Still, I wish you great enjoyment with this lens, but it remains, for your needs, an odd choice in my opinion...
I'm not looking for the highest resolution, I have a Summicron 50 for that. I am using the Sonnar at f4 and 5.6 for people, that gives enough depth of field for the face to all be in focus while the background drops off and the background looks nicer than with the Summicron or the Planar.
raid
Dad Photographer
I also use Sonnar lenses at 4.0-5.6 with people.
MCTuomey
Veteran
excellent shots, dng. now how'd you get that close-up - i didn't know you could get tubes for an m-mount lens 
meven
Well-known
Can we see more photos from the C-Sonnar?![]()
Here are mine with the C- Sonnar: http://www.flickr.com/photos/from_max/tags/zeisscsonnar50mmf15/
nasdak
Established
Here's one at 1.5 (2.8 optimized but who cares)

maddoc
... likes film again.
Thanks to this thread (and Roger`s musings about this lens) I joined the club ... 
1,5/50 Sonnar T* (Nikon S-mount):
All with Nikon S / 100ACROS + Rodinal 1:50
1,5/50 Sonnar T* (Nikon S-mount):



All with Nikon S / 100ACROS + Rodinal 1:50
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.