Nomad Z
Well-known
I'm not too sure of the value of a reference shot with another camera.
The reference shot is to eliminate, or confirm, whether any horizontal banding is something in the sky (or a feature of whatever you choose as a background).
pinafore2
Established
I have seen it once
I have seen it once
I have seen it once on the slide above (The colored stripes to the left are from the scanner) there is also the darkened sky.
What i notice is that it appeared in this shot, directly against the sunset, only.
I think this shot was made with the jupiter 12 lens and my jupiter 12 has no scratches or dents in the glass itself, but the paint on the edge of the rear element is in a poor condition. I suggest maybe this could be the light-leak ?
I have seen it once

I have seen it once on the slide above (The colored stripes to the left are from the scanner) there is also the darkened sky.
What i notice is that it appeared in this shot, directly against the sunset, only.
I think this shot was made with the jupiter 12 lens and my jupiter 12 has no scratches or dents in the glass itself, but the paint on the edge of the rear element is in a poor condition. I suggest maybe this could be the light-leak ?
BradM
Established
I don't know the answer to the problem but this started to happen to my Kiev before the shutters completely seized and died.




ZeissFan
Veteran
Does the banding expand into the sprockets? Or is confined to the image area?
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
Heavily misexposed, in any case - but it is hard to tell which way in a print, as the printer will compensate the exposure either way towards the average.
Are the negatives extremely dense/fogged, or very thin? If the former, it seems to be a light leakage issue (presumably vertically on either spool side, affecting the film in transport). If the latter, the shutter blinds are effectively stuck close and what limited exposure you get is from the leakage through the seam formed by the blinds' imperfections.
Are the negatives extremely dense/fogged, or very thin? If the former, it seems to be a light leakage issue (presumably vertically on either spool side, affecting the film in transport). If the latter, the shutter blinds are effectively stuck close and what limited exposure you get is from the leakage through the seam formed by the blinds' imperfections.
BradM
Established
Thanks Sevo - the first few shots on the roll were fine. It's hard to tell what happened - after opening the back of the camera the second shutter would lag heavily at low speeds - and after a while it just seized the camera. Not worth repairing unfortunately. The lens of course, is still good. I'll get another body from Oleg at some stage.
john341
camera user
I think that there is light getting in between the shutter slats--forget a CLA, buy another body from someone like Oleg at OK Cameras-he knows Kievs back to front. Happy hunting without the stress!
john341
camera user
Your Kiev died during its first roll!! I can believe it. My Kiev 4m arrived and did not work at all.Apparently assembled incorrectly but Oleg put it together correctly snd it is my major user now. Good Luck in the future.
BradM
Established
Yes. I bought it from one of the major Ukranian traders on ePay. When it arrived it was working fine, I sat there for ages with the back off trying different speeds etc, firing it off dozens of times. The trader, to be fair, did offer me a refund if I posted it back (far too expensive), or a partial refund if I didn't. I was going to buy another from him in part exchange, but the others he had looked just as bad. So I'm going to leave it. I'm going to get another Kiev 4 body from Oleg soon.
David Hughes
David Hughes
Your Kiev died during its first roll!! I can believe it. My Kiev 4m arrived and did not work at all.Apparently assembled incorrectly but Oleg put it together correctly snd it is my major user now. Good Luck in the future.
Hi,
There's the answer: send it to Oleg.
My money's on the camera being "repaired" by someone at home and then put back wrongly. Kiev's are (?simplified) versions of the Contax design and that was noticeable for complexity. So hardly the best one to learn camera repairing on.
Regards, David
BradM
Established
A 'tested' Kiev 4 body from Oleg is actually cheaper ($46-$50) than his CLA cost for working on your own ($56). Plus there is the cost of sending it to him - (about US$44 from Australia).
David Hughes
David Hughes
A 'tested' Kiev 4 body from Oleg is actually cheaper ($46-$50) than his CLA cost for working on your own ($56). Plus there is the cost of sending it to him - (about US$44 from Australia).
Thanks for that info: it was a shock as postage to Oleg is about USD 17 for me.
Regards, David
agricola
Well-known
Where can one contact Oleg?
thanks
P.S. just noticed: is this it? http://www.okvintagecamera.com/index.html
thanks
P.S. just noticed: is this it? http://www.okvintagecamera.com/index.html
Last edited:
David Hughes
David Hughes
Where can one contact Oleg?
thanks
P.S. just noticed: is this it? http://www.okvintagecamera.com/index.html
Hi,
Yes, that's the man.
You'd best be warned that the post to Russia takes forever and a day. But in the reverse direction is fast. Don't let that put you off; a camera that he's seen to is a joy forever, etc, etc.
Regards, David
PS Does anyone know the Russian for "Damaged Camera for Repair" as I'd like to put it on the Customs form.
Last edited:
IlyaB
Established
.......
PS Does anyone know the Russian for "Damaged Camera for Repair" as I'd like to put it on the Customs form.
Неисправный фотоаппарат для ремонта.
____________________________
Ilya
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.