vincentbenoit
télémétrique argentique
I'm interested in first-hand experience accounts of Kodak Plus-X (PX) developed in Rodinal. Comparisons with Tri-X would be particularly useful. More specifically: would Plus-X rated at box speed give better highlight and/or shadow gradation as compared to Tri-X rated at 200-250, when used in bright sunlight (about 1/250 f/8 at 125 iso)?
Thanks
Vincent
Thanks
Vincent
FPjohn
Well-known
Rodinol 1/50
Rodinol 1/50
Hello:
PlusX rated at ISO100 in Rodinol 1/50 gives fine graduation, brilliant highlights and good shadow detail. Trix in Rodinol gives extraordinary graduation but my personal choice has been HP5+ which is not to everyone's taste.
yours
FPJ
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=15227
Rodinol 1/50
Hello:
PlusX rated at ISO100 in Rodinol 1/50 gives fine graduation, brilliant highlights and good shadow detail. Trix in Rodinol gives extraordinary graduation but my personal choice has been HP5+ which is not to everyone's taste.
yours
FPJ
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=15227
Last edited:
le vrai rdu
Well-known

kodak plus X rodianl 1+25 6 minutes, yashicamat 124
very similar to trix in my opinion, just a different speed compared to Trix
I really love this film
le vrai rdu
Well-known
and trix, rodinal 1+25 7 minutes , same camera

charjohncarter
Veteran
le vrai rdu, nice I like the 2cv.
le vrai rdu
Well-known
thank you 
micromoogman
Well-known
Very good combination. Rodinal is my favourite for almost any old type BW film. I even pushed the FP4 to ISO800 in Rodinal with really nice result. It performs well in D76 too. I'm still using a bottle of Rodinal that is at least five years old...
Attached is a ISO 800 picture developed in 1:50 mix for 30 mins in 24 degr. celsius.
Attached is a ISO 800 picture developed in 1:50 mix for 30 mins in 24 degr. celsius.
Attachments
filmfan
Well-known
Bumping this old thread for some more info...
I shot about 4 rolls of PX125 in Utah under very bright light, rated at IE 50 and will be processing in Rodinal. Any processing advice?
Thanks chaps,
-Sam
I shot about 4 rolls of PX125 in Utah under very bright light, rated at IE 50 and will be processing in Rodinal. Any processing advice?
Thanks chaps,
-Sam
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Slower film like PX125 will gain contrast quickly especially when you overexpose it.
I'd go with 1+50 for 11 min (out of my usual 12min). with two inversion every 3 min.
I'd go with 1+50 for 11 min (out of my usual 12min). with two inversion every 3 min.
Fotohuis
Well-known
PXP (E.I. 100) in Rodinal 1+50 13:00 minutes.
So for E.I. 50 11-12 minutes will be fine.
So for E.I. 50 11-12 minutes will be fine.

filmfan
Well-known
Great. I will give it a shot later today.
Ronald M
Veteran
Works fine if somewhat grainy. 12.5 min @ 68 , for a condenser enlarger. 1:75 dilution. 10 sec every 60 for agitation.
Vics
Veteran
Plus-X is history, though. Right?
Freakscene
Obscure member
Plus-X is history, though. Right?
No. It is still available in 135.
Marty
filmfan
Well-known
And I have a bunch of it.
Bingley
Veteran
Slower film like PX125 will gain contrast quickly especially when you overexpose it.
I'd go with 1+50 for 11 min (out of my usual 12min). with two inversion every 3 min.
Thanks for this post, Will. That's for iso 50, right? I shot some PX125 at box speed last summer, developed in Rodinal 1:50 for 13 mins. at 20C, and was not completely happy w/ the results. A little too grainy for my taste, particularly when compared to developing in Diafine. Here's a sample, developed in Rodinal as just summarized:

Fotohuis
Well-known
Like FP4+ is PXP not a fine grain combination with Rodinal.
Looking at APX 100 / Rollei Retro 100 the result in 1+50 is much better, spoken about grain in that way. (35mm example)
Looking at APX 100 / Rollei Retro 100 the result in 1+50 is much better, spoken about grain in that way. (35mm example)

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.