Kodak Stock Triples!

Others were doing a good job of refuting nonsense, so I was going to stay out of further exchanges. Then this popped up.

gavinlg said:
...There also seems to be a raft of evidence showing early HCQ treatment results in far lower death rate...
Click to expand...
No "evidence." Anecdotes. Only anecdotes.

gavinlg said:
...I also see no reason for the hundreds of individual physicians sticking their necks out to stake their reputations and practices on the drug if there wasn't something to it...
Click to expand...
A rather naive blindness to the many factors, finances not least of which, that can motivate hucksters.
 
Sal Santamaura said:
No "evidence." Anecdotes. Only anecdotes.
Click to expand...

No evidence?

https://c19study.com

The studies listed here don't count?

Sal Santamaura said:
A rather naive blindness to the many factors, finances not least of which, that can motivate hucksters.
Click to expand...

If we're going to consider selfish motives would it not then be similarly possible that censorship of a potential tool to help fight the virus would be an effective way to ensure the current administration isn't re-elected come November? Considering the sheer level of constant vitriol toward the current administration from the US media in the last few years I don't think it's an unreasonable potentiality to consider.

Again, I prefer to stay impartial with this level of politicisation, but the way in which this HCQ thing is being handled seems off to me.
 
Timmyjoe said:
Chip,

It has nothing to do with not liking a particular publication, and I don't believe every idea has the same value as another. Do you consider the President's recommendation of shoving an ultraviolet light up your anus to cure Covid-19, or possibly injecting yourself with bleach/disinfectant to cure Covid-19, are those all part of the "free exchange of ideas?"

...
Click to expand...

Clearly your opinion is political or ignorance. Show me where Trump ever said to stick a UV light up your anus? Try an be part of the solution, not the problem. It really does not help.

Here is Healight- a Cedar Sinai therapeutic involving introducing UV light into a trachea tube (or in the colon). This is real, and not sure whether it will pan out or not, but it is being looked at.

https://aytubio.com/healight/
 
gavinlg said:
the way in which this HCQ thing is being handled seems off to me.
Click to expand...

You're not alone there, Gavin.

Hydroxychloroquine - been around for more than 50 years, side effects well known, is widely available and not expensive

Remdesivir - Priced at More Than $3100 for a Course of Treatment


giphy.gif
 
markjwyatt said:
Clearly your opinion is political or ignorance. Show me where Trump ever said to stick a UV light up your anus? Try an be part of the solution, not the problem. It really does not help.
Click to expand...

Hilarious. The problem with Trumpistas is that they haven't seemed to have learned about video tape. The stuff this crackpot says on live TV is RECORDED, for all eternity.

https://youtu.be/DHkzqejFKbM

"Ultraviolet . . . Suppose you brought the light inside the body, thru the skin or some other way . . ." That means either down the throat or up the anus.

Best,
-Tim
 
Timmyjoe said:
Hilarious. The problem with Trumpistas is that they haven't seemed to have learned about video tape. The stuff this crackpot says on live TV is RECORDED, for all eternity.

https://youtu.be/DHkzqejFKbM

"Ultraviolet . . . Suppose you brought the light inside the body, thru the skin or some other way . . ." That means either down the throat or up the anus.

Best,
-Tim
Click to expand...

Ok, fine. I just showed you actual medical technology designed to do that (AYTU, Cedar-Sinai Healight). But Trump did not mention the anus! That was clearly political spin-meistering. I knew exactly what you were referring to, and heard the day he said it. He flubbed it a little, ok, but there were some ideas buried in there, and Healight started getting discussed a day or two later, and I suspect Trump may have heard about it during the meeting the day he spoke, but that is speculation on my part.
 
It is interesting to note how average RFF posters re-invent themselves as pharmaceutical experts overnight -they've all done their Google 'research'.
The Kodak deal is not about any particular drug. Instead, it is about a very 'unusual' business deal.
 
Out to Lunch said:
It is interesting to note how average RFF posters re-invent themselves as pharmaceutical experts overnight -they've all done their Google 'research'.
The Kodak deal is not about any particular drug. Instead, it is about a very 'unusual' business deal.
Click to expand...

The vast proportion of pharmaceuticals in the USA are imported, correct? While it may be an unusual business deal, I can understand the administrations push to be self-sufficient in something as crucially important as medicine, especially in the face of a worldwide pandemic where hundreds of thousands have perished and medical supplies have bottlenecked. With Fujifilm's huge Pharma division it makes at least some sense to consider Kodak for a similar roll, their prior financial mismanagement notwithstanding.

And forgive me for not simply regurgitating CNNs POVs.
 
Out to Lunch said:
It is interesting to note how average RFF posters re-invent themselves as pharmaceutical experts overnight -they've all done their Google 'research'.
The Kodak deal is not about any particular drug. Instead, it is about a very 'unusual' business deal.
Click to expand...

I don't see anyone claiming to be an expert and threads go off topic all the time. No big deal. The Ignore list option is there if you don't want to see posts from any particular poster.
 
The Ignore list option is there if you don't want to see posts from any particular poster.
Click to expand...
I prefer to share my point of view. If you have a problem with that, choose to use the ignore list, instead. Cheers, OtL
 
While I have very strong political views, I won't post further here. This thread has gone completely off the "photography general interest" rails and should be moved to "off topic", as it is now just a political back and forth argument.
Phil Forrest
 
I will continue to post because what happens to Kodak is very important to "Photography General Interest". I will continue (I know I am not perfect) to try and stay on topic regarding Kodak transitioning to include pharmaceuticals as part of its business. It will be very interesting to see what happens to their photographic output- do they spin it off? Do they continue it? Maybe they spin off Kodak Pharmaceuticals, but continue Kodak the photographic company. We are all adults, and I think we can handle this.
 
Reading the arc of this thread, I cannot find the words to express how grateful I am not to be inside an imploding country.

Good luck to Kodak, in their film production work. And a long hefty jail term for the crony capitalists...given the fate of Kodak at the hands of the suits the past decade or so, I wouldn't have thought that'd be a controversial statement.
 
"The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the circumstances around Eastman Kodak Co.’s announcement of a $765 million government loan to make drugs at its U.S. factories, according to people familiar with the matter.

News of the loan last week caused Kodak’s shares to rise as high as $60, before falling to about $15 on Monday due to a dilution in the shares. Amid the heightened volatility, trading volume has surged. The price spike briefly produced a potential windfall for company executives who owned stock-option..."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/kodak-...ock-surge-under-sec-investigation-11596559126
 
Bloomberg News:

Eastman Kodak Co. shares plunged in early trading Monday after a federal agency announced it was suspending a $765 million loan to help the former film company produce Covid-19 drugs, pending the outcome of investigations into potential wrongdoing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom