mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
I've just received a Konica Auto S3 that I bought on eBay, and I must say I think I'm mildly miffed. The camera isn't really as described by the seller. He said its in great cosmetic condition, which it is to a point. The leatherette (or whatever) material on the back seems to be peeling off at both ends (with sticky glue residue clearly showing under the edges). On the other hand, the material itself seems undamaged. Otherwise the camera is in good cosmetic condition.
He said the camera is fully working. That seems to be so, mechanically, as the shutter and aperture all work at least well enough. However, the meter is underexposing by at least a stop, which he must have known about. In his auction he posted photos taken with the camera, and included the negatives when he shipped the camera. They're on ISO 100 film, and the meter on the camera was set to 200.
On opening the camera up, everything looks OK - except that the light seals look very dodgy indeed.
So I ran a roll of film through it. I compensated for the meter issue by using silver oxide batteries (1.55V makes the meter read a little higher) and added 2/3rds of a stop to the indicated film speed (shot ISO 200 film as ISO 320).
The light seals really aren't as they should be - look at the left side of this frame:

The lens will flare, but its really pretty good. This shot was pretty much a torture test, shot with the sun just above the top of the frame.

Its the only shot from the roll with really obvious flare. I'd say the lens is pretty good in this regard, and adding a lens hood would only make it better.
So, while I'm slightly put out by the condition of the camera (I payed close to top dollar plus as I was expecting a camera in really good condition) I think that overall its a nice little unit with what seems a very good lens. I can fix the light seals up without too much drama (I have a light seal kit I picked up to fix an Olympus XA which I knew needed it, and still need to get to). But I am disappointed with the meter. Because it underexposes, it further limits the speed of the film I can put through it (max ISO 800 effectively becomes 400).
If I'd paid less, or knew more about the condition of the camera before buying, I wouldn't be put out at all. I guess that's the "fun" of eBay. (Although, to be fair, most stuff I've bought that way has been better than described, so perhaps I've been spoiled by good luck.)
Anyway, I still think the little Auto S3 can take a nice photo:

Thanks to anybody who's bothered "listening" to me vent! And any suggestions about the meter would be very welcome.
...Mike
He said the camera is fully working. That seems to be so, mechanically, as the shutter and aperture all work at least well enough. However, the meter is underexposing by at least a stop, which he must have known about. In his auction he posted photos taken with the camera, and included the negatives when he shipped the camera. They're on ISO 100 film, and the meter on the camera was set to 200.
On opening the camera up, everything looks OK - except that the light seals look very dodgy indeed.
So I ran a roll of film through it. I compensated for the meter issue by using silver oxide batteries (1.55V makes the meter read a little higher) and added 2/3rds of a stop to the indicated film speed (shot ISO 200 film as ISO 320).
The light seals really aren't as they should be - look at the left side of this frame:

The lens will flare, but its really pretty good. This shot was pretty much a torture test, shot with the sun just above the top of the frame.

Its the only shot from the roll with really obvious flare. I'd say the lens is pretty good in this regard, and adding a lens hood would only make it better.
So, while I'm slightly put out by the condition of the camera (I payed close to top dollar plus as I was expecting a camera in really good condition) I think that overall its a nice little unit with what seems a very good lens. I can fix the light seals up without too much drama (I have a light seal kit I picked up to fix an Olympus XA which I knew needed it, and still need to get to). But I am disappointed with the meter. Because it underexposes, it further limits the speed of the film I can put through it (max ISO 800 effectively becomes 400).
If I'd paid less, or knew more about the condition of the camera before buying, I wouldn't be put out at all. I guess that's the "fun" of eBay. (Although, to be fair, most stuff I've bought that way has been better than described, so perhaps I've been spoiled by good luck.)
Anyway, I still think the little Auto S3 can take a nice photo:

Thanks to anybody who's bothered "listening" to me vent! And any suggestions about the meter would be very welcome.
...Mike
