bence8810
Well-known
Understand also that old cameras don't really have a 60-year lifespan. They were manufactured when lubricants were crude, labor (assembly and repair) was cheap, and sometimes engineering was way ahead of material science (cf pot metal parts that crystallize and decay). The only reason why many old consumer-oriented cameras of yore look good today was that they were seldom used and then put away for decades. They might seem to work at a basic level but then... Even after a CLA, put them under heavy use, and you'll see a surprisingly short lifespan (or MTBF). I've had that experience much more with Retinas and other items with Compur 00s, but it's just as applicable to older Japanese cameras. Dante
Dante, as a big Konica IIIa / m fan yourself, what do you reckon I should do?
The Japanese store came back with a price that's a $100 USD above of what Greg would do it for inclusive of shipping etc.
The camera is excellent and I think if I press the shutter firm, it fires. I'll have to check my film over the weekend when I do the developing. I've been trying all sorts of speeds over the course of the week.
But actually regardless of the outcome, I'd like a CLA if I am to keep this camera.
How would the Konica stack up to a Leica M3 in built quality? If you say the Konica will not last, perhaps I better throw my money towards Leica and get something that'll last. Would that last?
Thanks
Ben
Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
