BSPhotography
Newbie
Hey guys,
now i havent used film for many years, and when i did i was never serious about it.... now i am however since Digital as taken my photography to places it never would have... and it seems it's taken me all they way back to film.. now the problem i have is in getting my film processed and printed.. i have just got a few rolls of film processed it was just generic Fuji film..1 roll was developed by a cheap fuji lab, with fuji paper and chemicals i assume? the results were awesome... beautiful greens and blues.. now i got another roll done at a cheap Kodak lab, the prints were like night and day to the fuji labs prints, flat colours, un sharp prints and just genrally not as nice looking, then a third roll was printed at a second kodak lab, with similar results, now i havent compared negs yet so i'm unsure if it's happeneing in the developing or printing stages, but i wanted to see what people thought... is using the same brand lab as film a necessity?
Tim
now i havent used film for many years, and when i did i was never serious about it.... now i am however since Digital as taken my photography to places it never would have... and it seems it's taken me all they way back to film.. now the problem i have is in getting my film processed and printed.. i have just got a few rolls of film processed it was just generic Fuji film..1 roll was developed by a cheap fuji lab, with fuji paper and chemicals i assume? the results were awesome... beautiful greens and blues.. now i got another roll done at a cheap Kodak lab, the prints were like night and day to the fuji labs prints, flat colours, un sharp prints and just genrally not as nice looking, then a third roll was printed at a second kodak lab, with similar results, now i havent compared negs yet so i'm unsure if it's happeneing in the developing or printing stages, but i wanted to see what people thought... is using the same brand lab as film a necessity?
Tim