Leica LTM Leica 35mm Elmar f/3.5

Leica M39 screw mount bodies/lenses
To be clear, I think that Erik was answering a question that would refer to lenses that had not yet been serviced. My lens, which was recently serviced, does not have any haze issues.
 
punkzter said:
That aperture control hood seems really awesome. I'm guessing it's the VALOO? Did you have any issues using that with the 35mm lens? It's designed for the 50mm right?

And yes, I did buy your M2..small world. :)
Click to expand...

The VALOO works fine on the 3.5cm Elmar. There is some minor mechanical vignetting just the very very edge of the corners. The hood is a good match.
 
Rayt said:
The VALOO works fine on the 3.5cm Elmar. There is some minor mechanical vignetting just the very very edge of the corners. The hood is a good match.
Click to expand...

Yes, this is what I experienced with that hood on the 3.5 Elmar, but in no ways was it really bad.

How's that M2 holding up? Good I hope.
 
I always understood that VALOO was primarily for darkroom and close focussing attachment use with 50mm Elmar. Although handy for adjusting the aperture it is comparatively heavy and (in my opinion) spoils the balance.
 
Dralowid said:
I always understood that VALOO was primarily for darkroom and close focussing attachment use with 50mm Elmar. Although handy for adjusting the aperture it is comparatively heavy and (in my opinion) spoils the balance.
Click to expand...

I agree with Michael here. The FOOKH is the most beautiful shade for the Elmar 35, but not only for the Elmar 35, also for the Elmar 50 and the Summar. It is wide enough for even the thickest fingers to change the f-stop.

Erik.


200px-FOOKHa.jpg
 
David Hughes said:
That price was a shock, I'll think twice before taking mine out of the house...


Regards, David
Click to expand...

Like the old adage "Ships are safer in the harbour....but that's not what they were built for."

Yes Summarons seem to have taken a jump lately. Elmar 35mm on Ebay seem to range from $200- $1000 USD.....(the latter price being quite a stretch IMO)...i may have paid $150 for mine.
 
Erik van Straten said:
I agree with Michael here. The FOOKH is the most beautiful shade for the Elmar 35, but not only for the Elmar 35, also for the Elmar 50 and the Summar. It is wide enough for even the thickest fingers to change the f-stop.

Erik.


200px-FOOKHa.jpg
Click to expand...

Erik,
Don't you mean the FLQOO, which is the hood that you illustrate. The FOOKH is the later hood for 35mm Summaron and Elmar.
The FLQOO you have mentioned in other posts as your favourite is what you illustrate and was introduced in black in 1936 for the Elmar 3.5cm.
See:- https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2511316&highlight=FLQOO#post2511316
 
Yes, you are right, the large one is the FLQOO and the short one is the FOOKH.
I'm getting old I guess.
For the Elmar 35mm f/3.5 the FLQOO is the best.

Leica II, Elmar 35mm f/3.5 thick cam, Tmax400/Adox MCC 110.

Erik.

48496037027_31b1beb0b7_b.jpg
 
My 35mm Elmar focuses very easily and smoothly, and the aperture is very easy to change. It was serviced by DAG earlier this year. One that is stiff in focusing likely needs serviced, that is not normal.
 
On my Elmar 3.5cm f3.5 lens which is scaled in "metres" and is a war-time lens, Leitz seem to have "gone over the top" with engraving focusing marks on the distance scale.
Most examples of this lens have 13 engraved marks.
My lens made in 1941 is engraved with 18 marks.
I wonder why they have engraved the 5 extra marks ?.
Why are the extra distances needed in war-time. Any ideas anyone?.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom