Krosya said:
...many still assume that if photo was taken by some big name photogrpaher who is published - it's a good photo. Not always so.
I have also seen many mediocre pictures from "famous" photographers, as well as masterpieces from unknown hobbyists. The online photographer article is nevertheless funny as it's more about the faked commentators than the famous photographers.
Krosya said:
...Composition Rules, as someone said before, however, have been around for much longer that photography itself. So, to follow them - is a pretty good policy.
I doubt there is one single composition axiom that stands over all. Italian Renaissance painters for instance saw it different than Flemish Renaissance painters, not talking about other eras, styles and artists. But they do mostly have quite much in common, and it's up to each one's taste how to apply (or break) it.
I do apply rules, but it's not so clear to myself which ones, how and when. Most is done instinctly. And what are the rules when breaking the rules...
In general, the more graphic a composition is, the more attention I give to framing, to proportions, to horizontal/vertical aligning, and so on. The more reportage-kind a picture is, when it's about to show people, and to show what they're doing, framing and tilting gets less important as long as the content is shown as I wanted. But also here, lots of space for rule breaking
Krosya said:
...Bob Shell, actually (Didier this one is for you) is one of them - average photographer who was able sell himself well at one point.
As for Bob Shell's pictures, I unfortunately couldn't see his flickr portfolio, because, for reasons unknown to me, some "adult" flickr categories do not show up in Germany and Switzerland, though I've disabled all filters. I have seen some other pictures on his website, which look professional, but not outstanding. But I was several times impressed by how many technical facts he knows by heart, mostly at the CVUG. Btw. I did not defend him "because he's famous" (what he likely not is) or "because I'd be a fan of him", but because I had concerns about the lawsuit. You may read
here (CVUG post) why I don't trust jury courts. There was a case not unsimilar to Bob's one here 20 years ago. The alleged criminal was finally acquitted, not because he's not done it, but because the jury was strongly mislead by the prosecutor and no real evidence brought in.
Didier