kehng
Established
This article was written on my birthday:
http://leicarumors.com/2011/06/22/l...rorless-system-camera-at-photokina-2012.aspx/
I am curious but for 3200€ am keen to see what they are thinking...
http://leicarumors.com/2011/06/22/l...rorless-system-camera-at-photokina-2012.aspx/
I am curious but for 3200€ am keen to see what they are thinking...
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Anyone thinking this will be cheap will be disappointed. I'm thinking this will still be priced above most cameras on the market.
This article was written on my birthday:
http://leicarumors.com/2011/06/22/l...rorless-system-camera-at-photokina-2012.aspx/
I am curious but for 3200€ am keen to see what they are thinking...
Not likely, as Leica would have to pay a M43 licensing fee.
More likely that Leica would simply make their own mount to compete with M43.
Stephen
kehng
Established
My Bad... Should have typed "Leica finally competing with M43"
gavinlg
Veteran
Leica won't enter m4/3... I'm fairly sure of that.
Paul T.
Veteran
I think he's corrected that.
I do hope they produce something innovative. Although I, for one, would have no objection were they to sub-contract some of the work overseas. It's great that they have European production, but if a camera made in two continents helped them hit the mainstream, what would be wrong with that?
I do hope they produce something innovative. Although I, for one, would have no objection were they to sub-contract some of the work overseas. It's great that they have European production, but if a camera made in two continents helped them hit the mainstream, what would be wrong with that?
jarski
Veteran
dont think they would bring something with so small sensor. especially if this camera is targeted partly for former R-system users.
gavinlg
Veteran
My Bad... Should have typed "Leica finally competing with M43"
Whoops, we posted at the same time... Although, I wouldn't get my hopes up about leica competing price-wise. I really hope they bring something innovative to the table though.
MartinP
Veteran
I'm not worried about the use of R-lenses (as I don't have any) but am still waiting for the X2 with a pop-up viewfinder in place of the pop-up flash, improved auto-focus and Hallo-Kitty edition.
Ok, possibly I was joking about the last bit.
Ok, possibly I was joking about the last bit.
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
The last thing m4/3rd need is Leica's meddling.
Olympus should make a contract with lens makers, not camera makers.
Get Fuji, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, Schneider, Zeiss on board, and people will have a lot to chew on. In addition to those "toy lenses" makers.
Olympus should make a contract with lens makers, not camera makers.
Get Fuji, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina, Schneider, Zeiss on board, and people will have a lot to chew on. In addition to those "toy lenses" makers.
Honestly, I have no issue with micro 4/3 cameras, but I just wonder how much life they have in them after its been show that larger sensors can go into similar size cameras.
PatrickONeill
Well-known
don't forget the digilux-3 was 4/3rds.
flop.
flop.
Paddy C
Unused film collector
Honestly, I have no issue with micro 4/3 cameras, but I just wonder how much life they have in them after its been show that larger sensors can go into similar size cameras.
I sort of agree. Some (I think Thom Hogan) did say that M43 was a dead end.
When I make my tire-kicking rounds and compare a NEX with a G2 or EP2 it's amazing how similar in size they are. And that's including the lens.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.