Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
Sometimes I wonder how my photography would have turned out if I hadn't bought my first Leica in 1965 and entered the world of expensive gear.
I doubt it wouldn't have been worse.
Back then it was very different as couple of decades later, it seems.
Primitive Zenit, huge F.
Now, while RF to me still easier to focus than manual focus SLR, it applies only for 35 and 50 mm lenses. Anything wider, SLR is fine.
Yet, what is "results"? Sharpness and lack of distortions or some content on the image? If first is most important, then Leica, I guess.
If content, I don't know anymore. My EOS and F slrs giving me pictures with content, they are less funky, prestige and more sludgy. But cost is not significant as with Leica mount.
I went "in explore" on Flickr several times so far. Most of it was RF gear pictures. I mean, pictures of RF gear. The only street picture I have "in explore" was taken with 35$ Nikon EM and 50$ Tokina 24mm f2.8...
But my interview with "Inspired eye" happened after my murky image taken with digital Leica M-E was spotted at LUF...