colonel
Established
Great shot, however if I didn't knew it was shot with the monochrome, I would get the impression it was an oversharpened jpeg
The detail is incredible
It's really the full size picture which is impressive
jcrutcher
Veteran
Ok, this one is better than my first.
MM, 90mm Summicron ASPH, ISO 320, F4.0

Private Property by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
MM, 90mm Summicron ASPH, ISO 320, F4.0

Private Property by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
jcrutcher
Veteran
A few more MM 90mm Summicron ASPH, F8 ISO320 1/1000

Abandoned Home by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
F8, 1/350

Abandoned Home by rootbeer2004, on Flickr

Abandoned Home by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
F8, 1/350

Abandoned Home by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
menos
Veteran
Flush this strange argument with photos, save the thread !!!
First with Nikkor-S.C 50/1.4,
next with 50/1 v4.

portrait - Nikkor-S.C 5cm f1.4 - foreground foliage by teknopunk.com, on Flickr

portrait - hat and coffee by teknopunk.com, on Flickr
First with Nikkor-S.C 50/1.4,
next with 50/1 v4.

portrait - Nikkor-S.C 5cm f1.4 - foreground foliage by teknopunk.com, on Flickr

portrait - hat and coffee by teknopunk.com, on Flickr
leicashot
Well-known
Guys I've said it before on Leica's blog and I'll say it again. The MM is not worth buying over the M9 for 'better' black and white tones. It's different yes, but better, no.
Where it kills the M9 dead is in pixel sharpness and high ISO performance - not even worth wasting 10 minutes to compare, IMHO. Hope that puts an end to it so we can all enjoy the 'best pics' from the M Monochrom. Cheers
Where it kills the M9 dead is in pixel sharpness and high ISO performance - not even worth wasting 10 minutes to compare, IMHO. Hope that puts an end to it so we can all enjoy the 'best pics' from the M Monochrom. Cheers
Richard G
Veteran
One of the temptations is to look at say Jazrm's marvellous theatre work with the M9 and tell yourself you can manage with just the M9. And for the moment I will stick with the M9 alone. But the Monochrom is really something else and Jazrm has one now too and for certain work it blows the M9 out of the water comprehensively such that no side by side comparison is necessary.
colonel
Established
Very nice menos
Thanks for posting
Thanks for posting
colonel
Established
Guys I've said it before on Leica's blog and I'll say it again. The MM is not worth buying over the M9 for 'better' black and white tones. It's different yes, but better, no
empirically I think you are wrong.
After comparing my M9 and MM extensively, the MM has a far richer range of tones, especially in the mid-range.
The colour filters of the beyer array seem to arrange pure tone, after conversion, into steps.
leicashot
Well-known
empirically I think you are wrong.
After comparing my M9 and MM extensively, the MM has a far richer range of tones, especially in the mid-range.
The colour filters of the beyer array seem to arrange pure tone, after conversion, into steps.
More tones may not be what people are looking for. To be honest I'm happy to forgo the extra tones for the ability to move color sliders in post. Having to use filters is not something I missed since going digital.
I have seen many amazing black and white pictures from color digital including my D800E that is no where near coming close to second to the MM.
....oops....yes now back to the darn picture posting please!!! lol
jtm6
Well-known
To be honest I'm happy to forgo the extra tones for the ability to move color sliders in post. Having to use filters is not something I missed since going digital.
Since going back to B&W film from digital B&W, I miss the ability to adjust color filters in post.
colonel
Established
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
If you enhance the blacks and make a black point the image will improve and the noise get less I think
.
tekst
Established
I'm over the mm already, my focus has now moved to this
http://www.achromaticplus.com/Achromatic_Plus/Achromatic+.html
Just kidding, beautiful photos in here! Jealousy is a bitch
http://www.achromaticplus.com/Achromatic_Plus/Achromatic+.html
Just kidding, beautiful photos in here! Jealousy is a bitch
The MM seems to be an even more polarizing camera than the Fuji X series cameras. Didn't think it was possible.
leicashot
Well-known
I'm over the mm already, my focus has now moved to this
http://www.achromaticplus.com/Achromatic_Plus/Achromatic+.html
Just kidding, beautiful photos in here! Jealousy is a bitch![]()
I will be writing an article comparing this to the MM in January....stay tuned
colonel
Established
The MM seems to be an even more polarizing camera than the Fuji X series cameras. Didn't think it was possible.
there is no polarization on the MM
you either have it or you don't
We should keep this thread to pictures
I am happy to explain in detail the improvements of the MM over the M9, and in fact any other camera available at the moment, but only on another thread
jcrutcher
Veteran
Some Harsh light conditions.
MM with Noctilux .095 F8
Processed my normal way LR4 + photoshop curves

L1000034-Edit.jpg by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
Same final shot from above plus Silver Efex 2 preset Dynamic Range Harsh

L1000034-Edit-Edit.jpg by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
I prefer the top one, what do you guys think?
Jim
MM with Noctilux .095 F8
Processed my normal way LR4 + photoshop curves

L1000034-Edit.jpg by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
Same final shot from above plus Silver Efex 2 preset Dynamic Range Harsh

L1000034-Edit-Edit.jpg by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
I prefer the top one, what do you guys think?
Jim
colonel
Established
Some Harsh light conditions.
MM with Noctilux .095 F8
Processed my normal way LR4 + photoshop curves
Same final shot from above plus Silver Efex 2 preset Dynamic Range Harsh
I prefer the top one, what do you guys think?
Jim
Can't see it too well on my work monitor, but I prefer the top one
I haven't bothered installing Silver Efex 2 yet.
My impression was that this software was good for getting good conversions from colour, rather then a picture already in monochomre, e.g. the MM.
What is your experience of SE2, is it any good ?
jcrutcher
Veteran
Can't see it too well on my work monitor, but I prefer the top one
I haven't bothered installing Silver Efex 2 yet.
My impression was that this software was good for getting good conversions from colour, rather then a picture already in monochomre, e.g. the MM.
What is your experience of SE2, is it any good ?
I've used SE2 for a while now. About 2/3 of my digital B&W are converted with SE2 the balance in LR4. I also use SE2 for scanned B&W film mainly to use the control point option. I rarely use one of the presets, usually use a one of the film type pull downs. My first guess on the mono is to try the film selection and see how that works. So long answer I'm not sure how SE2 will be used with the mono but I'm willing to try it and learn.
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
I do not like SE. It is too easy to get overprocessed results. The Monochrom does best with either LR4 or CS 6 without using plugins in my hands.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.