ranger9
Well-known
Ah, yes, Leica continues the tradition of premium models being denoted by a big ol' gnarly hardware-store wood screw over the adjustment port... “Look, he's shooting with the new Hillbilly Special Edition!”
Emile de Leon
Well-known
Hate that screw...lol..what the hell were they thinkin..
ptpdprinter
Veteran
Beats having a big red dot.Ah, yes, Leica continues the tradition of premium models being denoted by a big ol' gnarly hardware-store wood screw over the adjustment port... “Look, he's shooting with the new Hillbilly Special Edition!”
Huss
Veteran
why cant they line up that screw perfectly either in the horizontal or
vertical axis?
That would look krap on a $20 Kiev let alone an $8000 Leica.
vertical axis?
That would look krap on a $20 Kiev let alone an $8000 Leica.
Huss
Veteran
Beats having a big red dot.
No, no it doesnt. Just looks like something fell off and they put that there while waiting for a replacement part.
Huss
Veteran
I mean who cares about it as an imaging device? It’s all about that crooked screw!
;p
;p
sepiareverb
genius and moron
I’m looking forward to it, screw or not. That’s what electrical tape is for.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
It is shocking. 2020 and it still looks like from 1956.
So unevfing.
So unevfing.
benlees
Well-known
I never noticed that screw before... now I can't take my bloody eyes off it. I like how they changed it slightly from the 262; instead of getting rid of it!
peterm1
Veteran
A bit difficult to comment given the new one and the last iteration look virtually identical except for minor cosmetic changes and one functional one - what appears to be the slightly larger VF window of the M10.
lynnb
Veteran
Maybe it's the rangefinder adjustment screw. I wonder how much the accessory Leica screwdriver is - $1500 for the silver and $2500 for the black titanium?
Timmyjoe
Veteran
Yeah, I'm sorry but that screw is so butt-ugly.
Although the new version appears to be flat, as opposed to the previous version being slightly domed. Is that an improvement? Not really sure.
I'll stick with my antique M9 based digitals.
Best,
-Tim
Although the new version appears to be flat, as opposed to the previous version being slightly domed. Is that an improvement? Not really sure.
I'll stick with my antique M9 based digitals.
Best,
-Tim
james.liam
Well-known
Maybe it's the rangefinder adjustment screw. I wonder how much the accessory Leica screwdriver is - $1500 for the silver and $2500 for the black titanium?
If you have to ask you can’t afford it.
BronicaLee
Established
well, there goes another 401k 
Photog9000
Well-known
I'm sorry. You get a new 41MP sensor and all you can do is complain about a ***** screw! Unbelievable! I'm just hoping it will drive down the prices for the original Monochrom. Always lusted after one but sadly out of reach...
Calzone
Gear Whore #1
I'm sorry. You get a new 41MP sensor and all you can do is complain about a ***** screw! Unbelievable! I'm just hoping it will drive down the prices for the original Monochrom. Always lusted after one but sadly out of reach...
S,
Over 7 years ago I bought my MM. 7 years later it is still a great camera. Had the sensor replaced, and at the same time got an overhaul: both for free.
I know the M-246 is a more advanced camera in every way, but the MM still has its charm warts and all.
The only two things it has over a M-246 is its unique rendering (CCD) and to me a better midrange that allows it to transcend formats so that large prints look like medium format and at times with the perfect image capture and clean file even like large format.
BTW I remember the critics from 7 years ago. One poster here on RFF said, "Building a monochrome camera is dumb."
Also know because so many have reacted strongly to hating that mentioned screw, I now have the opinion that I like it a lot. LOL. Makes me want to buy the camera, which I find to be funny.
Cal
arseniii
Well-known
No, no it doesnt. Just looks like something fell off and they put that there while waiting for a replacement part.
Isn't that screw used for RF adjustment?
I guess the RF is weak it needs to be adjusted as you go
drewbarb
picnic like it's 1999
I find it amusing that that screw is so offensive to you guys. I've always felt the red dot was truly awful. I will always cover the dot with tape; however ugly and ridiculous the tape looks, it's 1000 times better than that stupid red dot. So to me the screw is a huge improvement. It looks simple and utilitarian; right in keeping with Leica's industrial minimalist aesthetic. Oh well; to each his own, I guess.
arseniii
Well-known
S,
Over 7 years ago I bought my MM. 7 years later it is still a great camera. Had the sensor replaced, and at the same time got an overhaul: both for free.
I know the M-246 is a more advanced camera in every way, but the MM still has its charm warts and all.
The only two things it has over a M-246 is its unique rendering (CCD) and to me a better midrange that allows it to transcend formats so that large prints look like medium format and at times with the perfect image capture and clean file even like large format.
BTW I remember the critics from 7 years ago. One poster her on RFF said, "Building a monochrome camera is dumb."
Also know because so many have reacted strongly to hating that mentioned screw, I now have the opinion that I like it a lot. LOL. Makes me want to buy the camera, which I find to be funny.
Cal
I think Monochrome is the best and most value camera that Leica makes. I can replace an M10 (yes Fujifilm) but there is nothing out there to replace Monochrome. And the output is unbelievable, love it.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.