bherman
bherman
All;
I have a Leica M8 with a 28mm F/2.8 Elmarit ASPH, (37mm on the M8) and a 50mm F2 Summicron (67mm on the M8) . I now have an opportunity to get a beautiful 40mm F2 Rokkor-M, which should equate to a nice 53mm 'Normal' lens.
Do you think that it is a good fit, or too much overlap? I will probably either get the 40mm now, or a 75mm Summarit sometime soon.
Any comments?
Thanks!
-Brad
I have a Leica M8 with a 28mm F/2.8 Elmarit ASPH, (37mm on the M8) and a 50mm F2 Summicron (67mm on the M8) . I now have an opportunity to get a beautiful 40mm F2 Rokkor-M, which should equate to a nice 53mm 'Normal' lens.
Do you think that it is a good fit, or too much overlap? I will probably either get the 40mm now, or a 75mm Summarit sometime soon.
Any comments?
Thanks!
-Brad
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Too much overlap and no frameline, I wouldn't get it.
Instead of the Summarit, you could spend the money on a 75mm Heliar, the older f2.5 is a beautiful sleeper and the new f1.8 version is nice and fast.
Instead of the Summarit, you could spend the money on a 75mm Heliar, the older f2.5 is a beautiful sleeper and the new f1.8 version is nice and fast.
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
What he said.
Phil Forrest
Phil Forrest
noimmunity
scratch my niche
If you have an M8, not an M8.u or M8.2, the 40 will match the 35 framelines at distances of greater than 2 meters out much better than a 35 would. I often use a 40/2.8 in this way. However, if you are shooting closer than that, you would have to account for a crop.
The two lenses you have make a great pair on the M8. What's not working? You hanker after an equivalent focal length nearer to 50? If you can answer that question, then you will know what FL you need. Otherwise, it might just be a GAS itch.
The two lenses you have make a great pair on the M8. What's not working? You hanker after an equivalent focal length nearer to 50? If you can answer that question, then you will know what FL you need. Otherwise, it might just be a GAS itch.
MCTuomey
Veteran
Get a ZM 18/4. Or one of the VC 75's as mentioned above. Or a 90 Elmarit. Not a 40, no, unless you really love its rendering or some other quality other than focal length. --Mike
All;
I have a Leica M8 with a 28mm F/2.8 Elmarit ASPH, (37mm on the M8) and a 50mm F2 Summicron (67mm on the M8) . I now have an opportunity to get a beautiful 40mm F2 Rokkor-M, which should equate to a nice 53mm 'Normal' lens.
Do you think that it is a good fit, or too much overlap? I will probably either get the 40mm now, or a 75mm Summarit sometime soon.
Any comments?
Thanks!
-Brad
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
Just get that 40 - it cannot be that expensive, and it is a lovely little lens, one of the best-matched lenses to the M8.
LCT
ex-newbie
Yes and file the flange to bring up the 35mm frame lines. This way you'll have the most accurate framing at medium to long distance if your body is not an M8.2. For 40.5mm IR-cut filters, see http://tinyurl.com/829cgk7.
ramosa
B&W
Depends on how many lenses you plan to have. If just three, I would recommend against 28/40/50. Instead, I'd go with 28/50 and something shorter or longer, depending on how you see/shoot. I'm a 35/50/90 guy, but that approach certainly won't work for many others.
It's not too much overlap at all for the M8.
A 28mm lens is a 37mm lens and the 50mm is a 67mm lens. A 53mm lens will come in very handy... even a 35mm becomes a 47mm which would work. Remember, a 75mm lens becomes a 100mm lens and the framelines are sort of lame for 75mm on digital Ms.
A 28mm lens is a 37mm lens and the 50mm is a 67mm lens. A 53mm lens will come in very handy... even a 35mm becomes a 47mm which would work. Remember, a 75mm lens becomes a 100mm lens and the framelines are sort of lame for 75mm on digital Ms.
jarski
Veteran
Summarit 75 is nice lens as well, no reason to dismis that. used 75 a lot when having M8, so would choose it also, over 40.
crispy12
Well-known
I'm using the CV 25, 35 1.4 and 75mm 2.5. This is on M8 only.
Sometimes I swap the 25 for 15. I also occasionally use a Nikkor 5cm f2 but mainly keep it for my film RF.
Sometimes I swap the 25 for 15. I also occasionally use a Nikkor 5cm f2 but mainly keep it for my film RF.
elmer3.5
Well-known
Hi, the 40mm lens works great on your m8, i used to have an m8 with a rollei sonnar lens.
The framelines for 35mm lens will appear as you set a 40mm lens on the m8.
In my experience this 5mm extras on the 40 mm focal length in comparison to a 35 mm one, give you more control on dof.
The 53mm fov is exactly the fov you get on a apsc camera with a 35mm lens set on it.
Also to get a fast 35mm lens you have to expend more money than a rokkor super sharp lens.
So go for it you won´t be disapointed.
Bye!
The framelines for 35mm lens will appear as you set a 40mm lens on the m8.
In my experience this 5mm extras on the 40 mm focal length in comparison to a 35 mm one, give you more control on dof.
The 53mm fov is exactly the fov you get on a apsc camera with a 35mm lens set on it.
Also to get a fast 35mm lens you have to expend more money than a rokkor super sharp lens.
So go for it you won´t be disapointed.
Bye!
The framelines for 35mm lens will appear as you set a 40mm lens on the m8.
Only if you've modified the lens.
The 53mm fov is exactly the fov you get on a apsc camera with a 35mm lens set on it.
Well that depends on the crop factor. The M8 is 1.33, the Nikon / Sony / Fuji stuff is 1.5, and some Canon stuff is 1.6.
semordnilap
Well-known
Get it, absolutely... 40 on an M8 is great. I shoot 28/40/50 on mine and it's perfect. 2 lens day = 28/50, one lens = 40. As said above, file it to bring up the 35 lines, and you will be happy.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.