Leica Review

[icebear]

Bill's orig. post is about the website he linked to and not about Leica cameras directly.

This guy has balls to ask for $2400 for workshops 😉.
Who is he trying to rip off? 😀 or better ::bang:.

Watch his Leica "Q2" video based purely on speculation and take a look/listen at his statement about the improved light capturing capabilities at 2:44.
Quote:
[...the old camera had only ISO up to 50000 and 10 frames of shooting and the new one could go up to over 100.000 ISO and that would mean it perfoms far better in low light ...]

That's all I need to know about the qualification of this guy🙄.
What a joke.

 

[Mudman]

Leicas are good for everything except saleable portraits. It is called micro contrast and they pick up too much detail.

When I send the Nikon files to be printed, the people look smoother and without retouching. I use very large light modifiers which also helps.

Huh??

My M8 on an engagement shoot. And I've used leicas at weddings and nary a complaint.

 

[Dogman]

I've owned three film Leicas and a number of Leica lenses in my lifetime. Loved using them but they are gone. These days it's a simple fact, given prices on even used digital Leica equipment, I will never own anything Leica again. As such, I don't read Leica reviews.

 

[MCTuomey]

Still . . . I keep thinking a leica Q would be very satisfying!

'tis for me ... pricey tho' it be

 

[Mudman]

Another Portrait with the M8 and a 50mm summicron