I'd like a FF M-mount camera with a hybrid finder like the X-100. Weather sealed but made of less expensive materials than the current M, with no optical RF and manufactured in Japan. That would reduce the cost and make it "mini". Make it in black and silver with the lovely Leica script on top to class it up. We have the technology... is this too much to ask?
Well, for me it is an overpriced point and shoot. For that price I can get a Canon 6D with 35 1.4 L -go figure...Well, everyone has these expectations which will surly be dashed by Leica. What you will get is a non full frame body with a fixed lens or maybe interchangeable lenses for $3000 to $4000 USD more or less. Build quality may be the same as Fuji only the Fuji will be a MUCH better camera for the money hands down. I came to this conclusion last year at the Photo Expo Plus when I had a chance to fiddle with the new Leica stuff and then had a chance to play with all the Fuji cameras. What struck me is how close the feel of the X Pro was to the Leicas and how much better the rear LCD was compared to the new M. Image quality blew away my M8 and seemed better than the M9 , especially at ISO's past 1200. Recently I have been in a battle thinking about buying a new M, and recently had a chance to use my X-Pro 1 in the blast furnaces at the Bethlehem Steel plant in Bethlehem PA. The image quality left me speechless! Tones and detail were scary good! I was using the 18-55mm Fujinon Zoom and the 35mm f1.4. the only Leica lens used was a Noctilux with the Fuji M adapter. In every respect the Fuji lenses blew away EVERY Leica lens I have. It just does not get better than this! I have been shooting Leica since 1989 and I have come to this conclusion. So here we are talking about this new mini M. I am yawning at this with a giggle, for I know that Fuji also has some great stuff up its sleeve this year, and that is VERY exciting to me!
Well, for me it is an overpriced point and shoot. For that price I can get a Canon 6D with 35 1.4 L -go figure...
Thank God this is only a rumor. For one, it cannot be an "M" unless it uses the M lenses, and so far it does not seem that this one does.
That is fine I have nothing against point and shoots; I just bought a new old stock X1 for 650 Euro net. Now that is a decent price, quite nice camera within its limitations too. The point is that I am all for people buying the camera that takes their fancy but balk at unrealistic claims, as image quality nowadays is so good that any of the top dozen cameras -or even more- will produce prints that are nearly indistinguishable up to A3+. As for lenses, well, I think that the opinion of the poster I responded to is rather ermmm... unique, despite the undoubted good quality of the Fuji offerings.Well for accuracies sake… for twice of the Fuji and 35/1.4 price you could get a 6D and 35L as you mention.
But that's OK Jaapv. It's OK to disregard the Fuji as a point and shoot.
Hell, the Leica S2 is a point and shoot also 😉
Doesn't look promising, guess this confirms it