Roger Hicks
Veteran
Or an account of Leicas' advantages and disadvantages and why (and how) I've used 'em for 40+ years, as an amateur and professionally: http://www.rogerandfrances.com/subscription/leicaphilia.html
A couple of links don't work (articles not up yet) and there are a few minor changes needed, but the webmaster is aware of these.
Cheers,
R.
A couple of links don't work (articles not up yet) and there are a few minor changes needed, but the webmaster is aware of these.
Cheers,
R.
Chris101
summicronia
By the title, I was thinking this would be about something kinky I could do with my camera. Instead it is a thoroughly enjoyable article. We RFF denizens knew all that, but it's a fun read none-the-less.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Dear Chris,
First trannies and now this...
Thanks for the kind words.
Cheers,
R.
First trannies and now this...
Thanks for the kind words.
Cheers,
R.
Uwe_Nds
Chief Assistant Driver
Roger,
Thank you! A pleasure to read - as usual.
Cheers,
Uwe
Thank you! A pleasure to read - as usual.
Cheers,
Uwe
newspaperguy
Well-known
Thanks Roger and Frances...
went right to the print, punch, bind and save files.
went right to the print, punch, bind and save files.
Last edited:
damien.murphy
Damien
First trannies and now this...
I'm just thankful fanny packs have not translated across the atlantic, as hearing of both trannies and fannies in more common usage than I'm accustomed to, would be too much for me
Haven't read the article fully, but it looks like a great place to point friends of the opinion Leica ownership is restricted to collectors and dentists..
Keep up the good work, reading your articles is a pleasure,
Damien
Krosya
Konicaze
Interesting read - cant say I agree with everything, but its always fun to see another point of view on the subject of cameras.
Mr_Flibble
In Tabulas Argenteas Refero
Interesting read indeed and many good points and arguments, Roger. Thought I felt it started get a bit repetitive towards the haters in the conclusion.
Still a good read for this distracted desk jockey
Still a good read for this distracted desk jockey
John Lawrence
Well-known
I enjoyed reading this and couldn't agree more with the underlying message of 'if it suits you and your photography, then use it'.
Also liked the passage about CLAs. Reminded me of one repairer who was infamous for never taking apart any of the cameras he got in for a CLA. Instead he would just take a hypo filled with grease and squirt it into the mechanicals prior to returning the camera to its owner. The strange thing was he got very few back, and a good many letters of commendation for the work he had(n't) carried out!
John
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
Thanks, Roger, I really enjoyed that.
Chris101
summicronia
... First trannies and now this...
Thanks for the kind words. ...
What clinched it for me, was that you included a picture of my first love.
A late 1964 Beetle. <3 <3 <3
Attwo
-
Thanks, Roger, I really enjoyed that.
+1. Quite amusing.
What clinched it for me, was that you included a picture of my first love.
A late 1964 Beetle. <3 <3 <3
![]()
A 1967 model according to the plates.
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
Roger, it appears that, as a younger man, you tend(ed) to have a penchant for photographing young, pretty girls ;-)
I enjoyed reading the article.
I enjoyed reading the article.
maggieo
More Deadly
Roger, none of the illustrations are loading for me and the url for them seem odd and return a 404 error. For instance:
http://www.rogerandfrances.com/subscription/..%5Cimages%5Cleicaphilia%5C1%203x%20m.jpg
edit: how odd- the page looks fine in Safari, but is a mess in Firefox.
http://www.rogerandfrances.com/subscription/..%5Cimages%5Cleicaphilia%5C1%203x%20m.jpg
edit: how odd- the page looks fine in Safari, but is a mess in Firefox.
Last edited:
FrankS
Registered User
Roger, it appears that, as a younger man, you tend(ed) to have a penchant for photographing young, pretty girls ;-)
I enjoyed reading the article.
I wasn't going to follow the link, but after this review, I will.
feenej
Well-known
Still a great photo. Car driving into her head does not matter much.
Water Ouzel
Water Ouzel
+1. Quite amusing.
A 1967 model according to the plates.
Now you've gone and complicated things. Or, maybe, VW America dd.
Disambiguating various model years of bugs, for us on this side of the pond, was simplified a bit by (visual) changes in '66 with the "1300" badge on the engine cover, and in '67 with its "Volkswagen" badge on the engine cover. Which is why I'd have guessed '64 or '65 for the bug in the picture.
ray*j*gun
Veteran
Outstanding article Roger even without the pics...which I can't bring up either. I truly enjoy the way you write!
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
A good read, I like the question and answer style of the writing.
But I can't see any pictures. Hopefully it's fixed when the article is published.
But I can't see any pictures. Hopefully it's fixed when the article is published.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
The Beetle is a '64 US-spec, bought second-hand in Bermuda and imported into the UK in '67 or '68.
Dail and I were together for rather over 3 years.
Glad people have been enjoying it. Dunno why the pics won't load for some. Sorry! I'll contact the web-master.
Cheers,
R.
Dail and I were together for rather over 3 years.
Glad people have been enjoying it. Dunno why the pics won't load for some. Sorry! I'll contact the web-master.
Cheers,
R.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.