nation_of_pomation
Established
Hi guys!
I finally have amassed what I (think that I) want for a LTM system, but I'm on a student's budget so I've had to go slowly with getting my cameras and repairing them. I have a local guy that has been able to do pretty much anything I've given him thus far, including my first FSU camera (FED-5B) without problem. My next project is an excellent condition Zorki-6 I got from Fedka that unfortunately isn't focusing to infinity and I'm guessing the rangefinder might be totally off. I never even ran a roll through it before I noticed the focus problem, but it's been long enough since I got it that I should have noticed sooner. Maybe it got bumped too much in the mail? Anyway, I want to give it to my technician to have it checked out and CLA'd as need be. I was planning on using this Zorki-6 as my body mainly for my Jupiter-9, Jupiter-11, and future Jupiter-3, since it has a longer rangefinder base than my Zorki-4K. Should I include my Jupiter-9 with the camera when I give it to the repairman and as him to use that lens to calibrate it, or does it matter? I don't think I understand 100% some of the shimming/adjusting that some of the more advanced members talk about, but I figured since nothing is ever identical, the lens with the smallest minimum depth of field would make it the most accurate, or at least as close as possible for the most exacting lens. I tested the Jupiter-9 on my Canon P against a Canon 135mm f3.5 and it focused properly with the same mid-distance subject, both handheld. So, I think it's a good J-9 for a late black LZOS model. What are your thoughts?
I finally have amassed what I (think that I) want for a LTM system, but I'm on a student's budget so I've had to go slowly with getting my cameras and repairing them. I have a local guy that has been able to do pretty much anything I've given him thus far, including my first FSU camera (FED-5B) without problem. My next project is an excellent condition Zorki-6 I got from Fedka that unfortunately isn't focusing to infinity and I'm guessing the rangefinder might be totally off. I never even ran a roll through it before I noticed the focus problem, but it's been long enough since I got it that I should have noticed sooner. Maybe it got bumped too much in the mail? Anyway, I want to give it to my technician to have it checked out and CLA'd as need be. I was planning on using this Zorki-6 as my body mainly for my Jupiter-9, Jupiter-11, and future Jupiter-3, since it has a longer rangefinder base than my Zorki-4K. Should I include my Jupiter-9 with the camera when I give it to the repairman and as him to use that lens to calibrate it, or does it matter? I don't think I understand 100% some of the shimming/adjusting that some of the more advanced members talk about, but I figured since nothing is ever identical, the lens with the smallest minimum depth of field would make it the most accurate, or at least as close as possible for the most exacting lens. I tested the Jupiter-9 on my Canon P against a Canon 135mm f3.5 and it focused properly with the same mid-distance subject, both handheld. So, I think it's a good J-9 for a late black LZOS model. What are your thoughts?