S
StuartR
Guest
Well, not to rain on the parade, but I think there is another area where interchangeable lens rangefinders do better -- focusing accuracy. Most interchangeable lens rangefinders have a much longer baselength and a larger, clearer viewfinder which can allow you to frame more accurately and focus more accurately. Lens speed is also an issue -- The fastest fixed lens RF I can think of is a f/1.7 lens RF (though there are probably faster ones...), but with interchangeable lenses you can get a f/.95 or a f/1 lens, and there are many f/1.2 and f/1.4 lenses in various focal lengths. Another thing you tend to get is more aperture blades...many of the fixed lens RF's (other than the Hexar AF) give you 5 aperture blades. This can lead to unpleasant shapes in out of focus light sources.
Anyway, I think the fixed lens RF's offer incredible bang for the buck, but they do have limitations. Considering that you can obtain a very good interchangeable RF lens system for comparitively little money these days (voigtlander or used stuff), I think it makes sense to consider the interchangeable lens RF's. No one is saying to go out and buy the 35mm summilux ASPH, but the 35mm ultron will be a better lens than almost any of the fixed lens RF's and you can get it for under 400. Add a used bessa and you are still barely over 500 bucks.
Anyway, I think the fixed lens RF's offer incredible bang for the buck, but they do have limitations. Considering that you can obtain a very good interchangeable RF lens system for comparitively little money these days (voigtlander or used stuff), I think it makes sense to consider the interchangeable lens RF's. No one is saying to go out and buy the 35mm summilux ASPH, but the 35mm ultron will be a better lens than almost any of the fixed lens RF's and you can get it for under 400. Add a used bessa and you are still barely over 500 bucks.