Lens with 3D look

[Scapevision]

I'd first like people to post images that they claim has this "3D" rendering. I'm skeptical of this claim that's circulated for years. Prove me wrong!

Pozer by Scapevision, on Flickr


Wheels by Scapevision, on Flickr

How's this?

 

[JChrome]

I'd first like people to post images that they claim has this "3D" rendering. I'm skeptical of this claim that's circulated for years. Prove me wrong!

Considering that we're describing something subjective, it's difficult to really prove it per se. But as others have said there are a lot of factors. Separation between foreground and background being highly important.

 

[Darshan]

Considering that we're describing something subjective, it's difficult to really prove it per se. But as others have said there are a lot of factors. Separation between foreground and background being highly important.

This is a fantastic photo! Care to share some details?

 

[Ko.Fe.]

It is subjective, IMO. Zeiss in color on digital is known for 3-D, not only on Leica. For BW it is worth to check ASHP lenses from Leica itself. Sorry, I'm not aware of cheap lenses for 3-D look. Nor I have Zeiss (anymore) or ASHP labeled Leica lenses (never) 🙂

Actually, I think, I hit it once with my relatives and Color Skopar 35 2.5!



Or maybe not...

 

[aaron.tam]

Not a Leica lens, but the 28mm Nikon 1.4 AFD provides some major 3D poppage.

 

[Huss]

Pozer by Scapevision, on Flickr


Wheels by Scapevision, on Flickr

How's this?

That is exactly it.

What/which lens/lenses?

 

[benlees]

The whole point of photography is to the 3d world into a 2d image, or am i missing something?

 

[mgilbuena]

This is a fantastic photo! Care to share some details?

Looks like Burning Man. A fantastic challenge and canvas for any photographer. I go every year.

 

[lynnb]

Another with the C. Sonnar 50mm 1.5 on M4.
I was impressed with this lens.

 

[Alfonso B]

What is the earliest known reference to this phenomenon? I'm curious if it's something new or known since the birth of photography and has it been studied?

 

[mcfingon]

Here's my evidence that the 35/f2 Zeiss Biogon has what can be described as a 3D effect. I think the same thing is also referred to as micro-contrast.

 

[mcfingon]

My other contender for a good 3D effect is the Leica Elmar-M 50/2.8.

 

[mcfingon]

I think the 3D look is enhanced by modern coatings and high contrast glass, so I would guess that it is only since the 1950's that people have started using the term.

 

[Alfonso B]

I do love the work showcased, but would still like to see a direct comparison of 2 lenses.

Edit: I think the look might indeed have something to do with high contrast, combined with high edge sharpness. That could explain why this look seems to be magnified in B&W, when you have a lens that might have a small part of the spectrum fringing while most of it is extremely well corrected. If we can associate this with actual measurable qualities, it becomes easier to point out those lenses..

 

[Rob-F]

C Sonnar 50mm f1.5, M4 AP400 in D76
(apologies for mis-identifying the lens earlier)

friendly #611 by lynnb's snaps, on Flickr

This has got to be one of the strongest--maybe the very strongest--3D effect shots I've seen! The dog seems ready to pop right out of my screen! The lens may not be the only contributing factor--I'm sure composition plays a big part--but it is a strong endorsement for the C Sonnar 50/1.5!

 

[Scapevision]

That is exactly it.

What/which lens/lenses?

Pentax 67 with 105mm, sorry to disappoint 🙂

BTW, anyone saying it's subjective and posting simply wide open shots are definitely not getting it.
Listen to people recommending the zeiss.

 

[rodt16s]

35 summicron v1
Think there is some 3D going on here


[url=https://flic.kr/p/7TRPie]

11-4-10-026-1-HP5 by Redt16s, on Flickr[/URL]

 

[tunalegs]

The problem with 3D effect is that it usually doesn't reproduce well on a computer screen. The resolution and size often ruin the effect, which I think looks better when it is subtle rather than overblown.

Does this work at all online? Because it works quite well as a print.

Wall by Berang Berang, on Flickr

Unlike most of what you'll see posted as having a "3d" effect this one doesn't rely on obvious tricks like an extremely shallow DOF or having the main subject contrast sharply with the value or shade of the background.

Community Garden by Berang Berang, on Flickr

This one does have rather shallow DOF, so probably works better on a computer screen.

Both of these though rely primarily on texture and lighting more than anything else. The lens and format only contribute by allowing relatively "long" and smooth transitions between in focus and out of focus areas.

 

[gnuyork]

Although this is relating to digital cinematography and Cooke vs new asph Leica lenses I feel it a relevant discussion about different optics under very controlled conditions. I've seen similar results from the asph Leica lens kit I bought for the M9 that I had. I actually wound up selling my new asph Leica glass because I felt it was lifeless and sterile. I went back to Zeiss and vintage Leica lenses. You may feel different but the video is quite interesting and reveals a noticeable difference in optics. Take a look.

https://vimeo.com/90168989

Illuminating

 

[JChrome]

Looks like Burning Man. A fantastic challenge and canvas for any photographer. I go every year.

Right on the money. You're blessed that you get to go every year!