Let's see your Leica M

adep said:
Here's my M2 w/elmar 50/3.5 via ltm to m adapter:

227767180_8d25b321f8.jpg
Click to expand...
That's one gorgeous looking M2...
 
My M3 was the second one posted on this thread. I just dug up a pic of my new acquisition as of just a bit over a month ago:

M6 classic titanium w/ Tri Elmar and grip

193573545.jpg
 
Not the entire family, but most of them...

1) M2 with collapsible Summicron and VC-II meter.
My battered, but beloved M2. The L.A. smog ate the vulcanite shortly after I got it, but the camera feels smooth as silk.

2) M4 with Summicron DR and VC-II meter.
The camera that will have to be pried from my cold, dead hands. I have another M4 that I stripped and is awaiting a coat of black paint.

3) M6ttl with 2/35 Summicron-M (4th) and SBOOI finder.
My first Leica. Sherry Krauter knows this camera intimately. It started out as a .85, but I had her convert it to a .72, because I couldn't see the 35mm framelines. Then it was knocked out of my hand and she had to replace a cracked bodyshell.:bang: Most recently Sherry added the MP/M7 flare fix.

4) M7 with 1.4/35 Summilux ASPH and Leicavit.
The hood is a Contax GG-2, to which I added a vent. For the past two or three years this camera has been my metered workhorse. It is from a very early batch and Sherry Krauter added the M7/MP flare fix to the finder.
 

Attachments

  • M2_2.jpg
    M2_2.jpg
    85.8 KB · Views: 9
  • M6tt.jpg
    M6tt.jpg
    61.9 KB · Views: 10
  • M7.jpg
    M7.jpg
    67.1 KB · Views: 9
  • M4_1.jpg
    M4_1.jpg
    74.1 KB · Views: 9
usayit said:
How well does the Voigtlander meter work? I've been considering one to replace my handheld sekonic.
Click to expand...

Works REALLY well. It's very accurate and pretty much mimics the meter in my M6ttl.

The VC-II is a huge improvement over the original model. For one thing it is half the height, but more important Cosina added a lock to the reading. The original VC meter was borderline useless, because it metered continuously.

With the new meter you look through the viewfinder and use the RF patch as your guide. The metering area equals that of the 90mm framelines.

Next, without taking your eye off of the viewfinder, you tap the little orange button on the back of the meter and take a reading. The meter will store that reading for circa 20 seconds or until you press the button again. Now you dial in your aperture and shutter speed settings and Bob's your uncle.

They aren't cheap, but well worth the money.

In any case I don't think I would totally give up my incident meter for one, but use both. You could meter off of your hand, but it's not as fast.
 
Last edited:
roundg said:
I am considering to send my black 3 lug M5 to some place for CLA. Could u let me know the cost at DAG?

BTW the chrome M5 with the summicrom on is really a beauty.
Click to expand...

Roundg;
DAG does a 3/4 and a full CLA. A 3/4 starts at around 200.
Sherry did a full CLA on my black M5 and also replaced the rangefinder patch, which had small cracks. The total cost was not inexpensive, but worth it. Its like a new camera now. Both people are top notch (los dos grandes) for m5 service.
Thanks for the comments.
 
Not having an M, I haven't paid a lot of attention to M lenses. I wasn't aware the old Elmar is still in production. It's a little faster and a little larger with modern glass and materiels but it's still a compact 4 element 3 group lens. I'm always amazed how good my Elmar clone Industar-50 is. An M2 with a new Elmar -- sweet!
 
Some fine looking examples. However I am wondering how many of you use your cameras which have been re-skinned?
I'm ordering a kit from cameraleather.com for my M3.
BTW: It will see use even after re-skinning it.
 
ERV said:
Roundg;
DAG does a 3/4 and a full CLA. A 3/4 starts at around 200.
Sherry did a full CLA on my black M5 and also replaced the rangefinder patch, which had small cracks. The total cost was not inexpensive, but worth it. Its like a new camera now. Both people are top notch (los dos grandes) for m5 service.
Thanks for the comments.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the kind reply and info. My M3 is under some 3/4 CLA in DAG now. I will check with them about my M5. Currently my M5 (still with the L seal) works flawlessly. But some haze I can see in the VF.
 
186653057_c5477abb31.jpg


1965 M3, 1966 rigid Summicron 50/2, dark yellow B+W filter, third party vented hood, Luigi case/strap
 
Last edited:
M6 with 35mm/3.5 Summaron (which, contrary to legend, is not a soft, low contrast lens).
 

Attachments

  • M6sum1.jpg
    M6sum1.jpg
    46.7 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Here's my M2 with Canon 35/2 attatched.
 

Attachments

  • leica.JPG
    leica.JPG
    32.9 KB · Views: 0
My lil' kit. I doubt very much I would use anything more than this. M6, 50 1.4 Aspheric, 28 cron aspheric.
 
KM-25 said:
My lil' kit. I doubt very much I would use anything more than this. M6, 50 1.4 Aspheric, 28 cron aspheric.
Click to expand...

wait till you have seen the new apo 75/2 asph.....:bang:

it knocked me down,
couldn't left the dealer without buying it
 
martin-f5 said:
wait till you have seen the new apo 75/2 asph.....:bang:

it knocked me down,
couldn't left the dealer without buying it
Click to expand...

I would have to get a .85 body for that, the way anything over a 50 looks in the VF looks strange and too far away for me.

This Leica stuff is for film only ( see name ), for that focal length, I use an FM3A with a 105 2.5, frames up much faster and is fairly unobtrusive.

.....and then there is always my enormous but spectacular 85 1.2 Canon...:rolleyes:

I am sticking with my tight kit, it is more my style.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom