LIGHT METERS - What do you prefer?

yeah, right. using any meter in incident mode will sometimes get a few looks. in reflective mode, it works the same as the vcii.
 
ghost said:
yeah, right. using any meter in incident mode will sometimes get a few looks. in reflective mode, it works the same as the vcii.

Really? Well, your personal experience deviates from mine. Guess that makes us both right in a Fox news balanced kinda way.
 
I use a Gossen Luna Pro with the silveroxide battery adapter. It must be 34 or 35 years old. The last set of mercury batteries died last year. Still works like a champ .... a little on the large size though.

Mike
 
Well, that question certainly got results. I prefer the selenium types as there is no worries about batteries. My only concern is the ageing cell - once gone that's it. I wil look into the VCII - sounds good to me. Where do I buy one from? I am in Australia and it looks as though it will have to be an overseas buy for me.

Peter
 
Crasis said:
Really? Well, your personal experience deviates from mine. Guess that makes us both right in a Fox news balanced kinda way.

or you could actually explain why the digisix is more discreet than the vcii!
 
ghost said:
or you could actually explain why the digisix is more discreet than the vcii!

Do you realize that the Digisix is actually smaller than the average cell phone?
 
I use a Gossen Digisi and LunaStar F on a regular basis. Both very accurate with both incident and reflected light. For play time, I have a 1960s vintage Zeiss Ikon CdS meter, a Sekonic L-158 selenium, and a Gossen LunaPro F.
 
After years of regarding handheld meters with disdain – I don't think I've ever owned a 35mm camera without a built-in meter (whether it was working properly or not is another story) – I bought a Sekonic L-428 from a pro shooter a few years back for $50. Recently, I discovered it had suffered some serious, mysterious damage ("mysterious" as in: I don't know how in hell it happened), which was awful, since I went to a good deal of effort, including an eBay sniping or two, to get a few hard-to-find bits for it like the optional spot-metering attachment. Fortunately, I found another L-428, via the 'Bay for a bit less than the previous one, and all's well. I don't use a handheld much, but in certain situations it can't be beat. And, while the 428 is hardly a spring chicken, it was introduced in the age of silver-oxide batteries and silicon-blue metering cells, both of which Sekonic availed themselves of with this model, so aging has been generally graceful.


- Barrett
 

Attachments

  • hexandsek.jpg
    hexandsek.jpg
    88.1 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
I use two meters:

My preferred is a LunaSix 3, but as mentioned before it is pretty big, so when I'm travelling light I use a DigiSix - which is much smaller in real life than you'd think from catalogue images.
 
I have to confess that I'm using a Casio pocket digicam with spot metering for my Agfa Ambi Silette. Then I get to preview the shot if I want, or even look at the histogram if I'm not in a hurry. I haven't been shooting with it for that long - 6 months or so - but sometimes the separate meter reading process seems cumbersome. Perhaps I'll try using Sunny 16, but I've also thought about the VCI or upgrading to a system with in-camera metering.

Duane
 
I started out with a Sekonic reflected meter I got in the PX in Korea a little over 30 years ago. I loved it. Then I got the Sekonic L28c2 which I hardly ever used as anything but an incident meter. Loved it more until I dropped it one time too many and it only worked when held sideways (?). Now it is a Gossen Luna Pro or Luna Pro SBC, depending on which is easier to grab or if I want the Luna Pro's smaller size. They are quite nice too. I also have the spot, 7/15, microscope, flash adapters. Seldom use them though. I usually keep one around but not always if I am using an SLR witha built in meter and am close to home. On a trip I will always have one as a backup (but have never needed it, go figure).
 
ARCHIVIST said:
Many of our fine cameras do not have built-in meters. So the need for a hand held type is required. I was wondering what preference you may have with regard type/make and wether a direct or an incident reading is favoured? I use selenium meters, Weston Euromaster and Sekonic L398, and allow for their low light failings. We all can estimate an average exposure but the need for accuracy for specific work and colour requires a meter.
Peter

I have a Sekonic Studio de Luxe (no batteries and useless in low light) and a Lunasix 3 to carry around but I use my eyes (call it sunny 16 if you want) most of the time. As somebody else said light situations tend to repeat and getting a shot is the most important thing. In the studio and for products it is a completely different story of course, but there there are not problems of time...

Giella lea Fapmu
 
Back
Top Bottom