Expatinprogress
Well-known
Hi,
I am scanning my first bunch of negatives with the Reflecta ProScan 7200. I'm using the default software -Cyberview X-, which is being very easy to handle and so far showing good results. I know I should use the SilverFast in order to squeeze the performance of this scanner, but that's another story.
Well, the thing is that when I try to import my TIFF files on Lightroom it doesn't recognize them: "Preview for this file not available" and "the following files couldn't be read".
Any idea why this happens?
I am scanning my first bunch of negatives with the Reflecta ProScan 7200. I'm using the default software -Cyberview X-, which is being very easy to handle and so far showing good results. I know I should use the SilverFast in order to squeeze the performance of this scanner, but that's another story.
Well, the thing is that when I try to import my TIFF files on Lightroom it doesn't recognize them: "Preview for this file not available" and "the following files couldn't be read".
Any idea why this happens?
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
It may very well be that you're saving the TIFF file with non-standard options. Use either uncompressed, ZIP or LZW compression.
Hard to know for sure without more technical info from your side. Good luck!
Hard to know for sure without more technical info from your side. Good luck!
Expatinprogress
Well-known
The software doesn't give any options when saving the files. You may either save them on JPG or TIFF, any other compression options available. I start thinking it might be the way the software works. Well, I' afraid I will have to use PS for a while until changing software.
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Interesting that a scanning software would not give you options for this. Since I'm not familiar with the software, I have no way of confirming this. Hopefully your manual says something about it.
I'd also check if it's by default saving four-channel (RGB + infrared) instead of three-channel (RGB only) files. Very common mistake with first-time users of an IR-channel capable scanner.
I'd also check if it's by default saving four-channel (RGB + infrared) instead of three-channel (RGB only) files. Very common mistake with first-time users of an IR-channel capable scanner.
Expatinprogress
Well-known
Thanks Gabriel, I just read the software's manual and says TIFF option generates an uncompressed file and 'without losses' (whatever that means). I am using the 8 bits option at 3600 ppi and saves 'RGB only'.
mugent
Well-known
If you are using a Mac, you could try opening the file in Preview, and re-saving it, see if that sorts it out.
Moray
Moray
Benjamin Marks
Veteran
Another option would be to download a program like Vuescan with more control over your output options. Vuescan, which is not expensive and which works with a wide variety of scanners, can be found here:
http://www.hamrick.com/
Ben
http://www.hamrick.com/
Ben
Expatinprogress
Well-known
I already tried to re-saving through preview but nothing. It seems I will have to change software. I will try Vuescan
johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
Are you scanning in 16-bit or 48-bit color depth? From what I read online (just did a quick search) it will work fine if you use 16-bit or 48-bit, apparently the CyberView X software is also capable of other bit depths that might foul Lightroom import...?
Anyway, if you want to try VueScan I can wholeheartedly recommend it. I have a Mediax 3600PRO and it has the same internals as the Reflecta's, a Pacific Image Enterprise (PIE) machine. For those machines you need to install CyberView X for drivers if you plan to use VueScan, but since you already have CyberView X installed, using VueScan should be easy as pie...
Anyway, if you want to try VueScan I can wholeheartedly recommend it. I have a Mediax 3600PRO and it has the same internals as the Reflecta's, a Pacific Image Enterprise (PIE) machine. For those machines you need to install CyberView X for drivers if you plan to use VueScan, but since you already have CyberView X installed, using VueScan should be easy as pie...
Expatinprogress
Well-known
Thanks buzzardkid, I am actually using 8-bit scann but I will try 16-bit to see if it works for Lightroom. That sounds like another vote for Vuescan then. Thanks for your advises.
MaxElmar
Well-known
It's only a slight exaggeration to say you might as well use a jpg with minimum compression if you are going to use 8 bit.
Be prepared for the scans to get a lot bigger when you go to 16 bit. But that's the deal. You'll have LOTS more data to work with!
Be prepared for the scans to get a lot bigger when you go to 16 bit. But that's the deal. You'll have LOTS more data to work with!
Expatinprogress
Well-known
Thanks MaxElmar. I am gonna need an extra hard-drive. At the end, it seems that putting analog into digital requires more resources.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.