foto_fool
Well-known
kevin m said:This, however, brings to mind the Voltaire quote: "All styles are good, except the boring."
Yes. And you are well-qualified to render this opinion, IMO
peterm1 said:I look on this kind of lens as one that is like a special brush. You use it when you want a specific effect in your pictures but it may not be one you use every day.
Agreed. Earlier I mentioned that I like the Summarit because it renders images that are less "clinical" than the Summilux. But if I could only keep one of them, it would be the Summilux.
Speaking of keeping one of them - I have two Summarits, an M-mount and a LTM. Personally I don't like the LTM Summarit - not for image quality, which is fine, but because it just seems to me to be too big on the Leica IIIf.
If anyone is interested in a cheap LTM Summarit - pm me.
- John
jamxo
work in progress
Ned - with regards to APX 400 I develop it for 5.5 minutes in Hc-110 Dilution B and get fantastic contrasy tones, which scan and print beautifully. Just an idea.
J.
J.
maddoc
... likes film again.
... old thread, I finally got a 5cm Summarit too. LTM version and looks very clean but difficult to focus ...
Both at f/1.5


Both at f/1.5
-doomed-
film is exciting
This thread makes me miss my ltm summarit , even with it's slight haze it was a great lense. The summarit seems to catch a bad rap, I loved it with color film, and you knew it was there since it weighed more than the bessa I mounted it on. It was prone to flare but then again you're talking about a lense that is nothing like modern lenses of comparable speed. One of the more underrated and affordable chunks of brass and glass from leica.
maddoc
... likes film again.
Share: