LTM wide angle recommendations

I had a Canon FL 19mm F3.5 with Canon Adapter B, which I was really fond of. Was my replacement for the 21mm Super Angulon. Very cost effective.
 
I vouch for the Canon 19/3.5. It does not have to be the (costly) RF version. With Canon Adapter B, the non-RF coupled 19mm/3.5 works very well for me.
 
There is also a Rokkor 21/4 that can be used on LTM bodies with the right adapter (Rokkor-ltm). This is also a very good lens. I have posted about it here in past years.

https://www.cameraquest.com/min21.htm

Here, with LTM adapter ready for use (seller claims):
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Minolta-W-...001869&hash=item33e5c0ffba:g:rEMAAOSwZgNZxiYW


s-l500.jpg
 
My widest RF lens has been for many years a 28mm lens. I used wider SLR lenses with adapters on my M3 and M6 cameras until very recently when I bought a 16mm RF lens. The very wide lenses offer nice alternatives to using 35-50 lenses once in a while.
 
I like to think of a lens as being part of a system. So if starting with only a 50mm, a good three-lens system could be 25-35-50. Since the 25mm is desired right way, you could start with that and fill in with a 35mm later, since it is such a useful focal length. Going from 25 to 50 with nothing in between leaves a gap in the middle, but it could be a good way to have the extreme covered until the gap can be filled.
 
Yes, the CV 25/4 ltm is a gem at a low cost. In fact, if you want a tiny lens combo for some trip, use a 50mm lens plus the CV 25/4 and you are covered.
 
It should fit, but I used it with FD lenses. Google Canon Adapter B. I use Canon FD 17/4 on Leica M bodies with this adapter.
 
The FD 17/4 is a near rectilinear lens, and there is no observed distortion. It is larger than a RF wide angle lens, but it gives superb results.
The Canon FD 24/2.8 is also a great lens to explore this way.

Enjoy your Canon Adapter B!
 
Back
Top Bottom