brennanphotoguy
Well-known
Guess you missed my last sentence as well.
I hope times proves your prediction correct.
That would be great for Leica fans, but even better for Leica in the face of tough competition.
Stephen
I'm going to say no. It will have a different sensor. Besides, the Q/SL sensor was already behind current tech. at the time Leica used it in those cameras.
The sensor is not going to be slightly different. The sensor is going to be completely different and that is all I can say and know. The camera is going to be quite refined in the way the Q and SL are. It is going to be more focused as to what a traditional M is.
Excuse my ignorance, but why is Leica so behind in sensor technology? Aren't all camera makers purchasing their sensors from third parties, so why can't Leica purchase the latest & greatest sensors from them, too, especially if they produce cameras in such low quantities? 😕
Excuse my ignorance, but why is Leica so behind in sensor technology? Aren't all camera makers purchasing their sensors from third parties, so why can't Leica purchase the latest & greatest sensors from them, too, especially if they produce cameras in such low quantities? 😕
Actually the sensors in the Q and SL are made by TowerJazz, a Panasonic subsidiary. They are slightly more advanced than the Cmosis one in the M240.1) there is only one sensor maker that's slightly ahead of cmosis and that's Sony
2) cmosis offers custom sensors (micro lenses, ir filter, etc)
3) cmosis is European which adds research funding opportunities
Roland.
A good argument, but we cannot be sure that the tripod mount corresponds to the nodal point.Notice that in the photos the tripod mount is moved back. The nodal point is moved back. The thiner design is in a large part due to the electronics Jaapv has mentioned.
A good argument, but we cannot be sure that the tripod mount corresponds to the nodal point.
Unfortunately many Leica cameras lack a film/sensor plane indication.
We have, IMO, reached a plateau where "improvements" in sensor technology -which will certainly come, after all, new cameras must be sold- have become largely irrelevant.
We are back in the days of film, where the emphasis is on the quality of lenses, build, ergonomics, concept and general perception of the camera.
If you have ever experienced how bad Leica lenses sometimes work together with a standard sony sensor, then you are probably happy that Leica does use a sensor thats made for this camera and these lenses.
The screen does not really affect the thickness; the 1.5/2 mm it takes is about the amount it protrudes from the body. The real culprit is the filter array/sensor/motherboard assembly which takes up about 5 mm. The real way to get it to be thinner is to replace the sensor by film.😉 Or thin the electronics down.

I am very much enjoying what a traditional M is apparently not supposed to be. As someone with long fingers, I have never found the M240/246 form factor to be an issue for ergonomics, the body balances and grips very well for heavy lenses like the 75/1.4, and apparently I lack the gene that would cause me to accidentally press the movie button. I am worried that a thinner body would actually be harder to hold (my brother's M7, for example, is only slightly smaller but feels like it needs a grip).
Could the M be better? Yes; the electronics could deal with self-formatted SD cards a little more smoothly, and the EVF refresh rate could be better. But those are actually pretty small things compared to the price tag of a new camera.
I think the bar would be even higher for a Monochrom 246, which can shoot in pretty much any light in which humans can see and never breaks a sweat in terms of noise.
But I'd love to see what they come out with. I'll probably buy it anyway. Just making a record of token resistance for now. 🙂
Dante

Let's be real, Leica is whatever they choose to do. What is the most advanced EVF ever placed in digital camera? The SL's EVF. In fact the SL has a number of ground breaking features. It's also too big. But a beautiful thing in many ways. That they would not put a better sensor in the M10 because they don't won't to undercut the SL? Ridiculous. The SL has it's own niche based on all the things it can do, shoot S, R and M lenses.Which is what the rumor sites get. And let's be real, Leica is always behind in sensor tech. AND they won't release a sensor that's better than the SL since that's their "pro" flagship camera.
Actually the sensors in the Q and SL are made by TowerJazz, a Panasonic subsidiary.
Possibly. But it will take quite some engineering to fit a rangefinder coupling and frame selector mechanism in.This is misleading. In fact it's possible to contain the thickness under a circular flange while making the majority of the body extremely thin.
Leica lens problems on Sony A7 have nothing to do with the sensor. It's the glass and filters placed on top of the sensor in the A7 design. That is simply a design spec. Nothing to stop a sony sensor customer from asking to spec the schott BG55 .8mm coverglass be placed on the sony sensor and then leave out the filter stack, which is how Leica has gotten better performance with the sensors they have chosen.
Usually the Internet raves are about insane enlargements (ever calculated the size of a print that corresponds to a 100% view of a 50 MP sensor? 😉) or about a placebo effect.