M2users : how you guys meter ?

proenca

Proenca
Local time
12:00 PM
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
258
Location
Lisbon
Hi there,

Been taking pictures for a few years but even when I started ( Canon T70 days ) , my cameras had light meter built in.

I quickly learnt how to compensate but all my next SLRs and then DSLRs had lightmeters...

Then one day I got into a store and played with a leica.. the beggining of the end : got a M6 , one year later a M7 and then another year later a MP. MP was a joy to use although was stolen. Insurance paid and since I was in Singapore, got a spanking new M8 which I have for the last two years or so.

But I miss the MP. Can't afford one now.. but I was thinking about the M2.

Would prefer it to the M3 since I would like the 35mm frame and I dont like the google thing.

How do you M2 ( and M3 ) guys meter ? Gut ? Do you carry a meter all the time ? doesnt it seems tiring to meter the light every now and then ?
 
Use a Gossen Digipro F. Its quite light and would have it hanging round my neck from cord - you forget its there. Alternatively, if also carrying my R7, I use its light meter.
 
As rubymonkey says" Estimated exposure"
Good old Sunny 16 / and a CV II meter in the pocket just in case...🙂

Best to You -H
 
I have a Gossen Variosix F2 and an MC leicameter which I use sometimes, but I usually just take them out every 10 shots or so, if at all. it's pretty comfortable to meter once in order to get a more or less precise idea of the lighting situation and then just guess for the rest of the shots.
 
Last edited:
I have been using the Leica MR meter, but also the Sunny 16 rule with a great deal of success. I tend to use the MR meter when in low light but outdoors I generally don't need to meter especially as I mostly shoot print film (b+w at that) which has a wide exposure latitude which is forgiving if you make an error (and quite big errors at that!)
 
my small sekonic meter works for me - I used to think I need to meter every shot, but it's easier to work, I think, by metering sparsely (for light and shadow) and figuring out the lighting changes mentally in between.
 
As rubymonkey says" Estimated exposure"
Good old Sunny 16 / and a CV II meter in the pocket just in case...🙂

Best to You -H

Ha! Same here. I have now taken to carrying the CVII with me all the time and testing myself. It's turned into a game I like to play and has me correctly guessing within +/-1 stop 95% of the time.
 
I just guess based on the sunny-16 rule. I don't have a light meter at all. Usually it works out. It's trickier guessing indoors rather as light isn't as even.
 
I have a shoemount Voigtlander VC meter which matches nicely on top of my M2. Outdoors it is generally right on target, but indoors I always fare better to set the camera a stop below what the meter suggest. It also matches nicely with my other classic cameras as well.
 
Sekonic Studio Deluxe II, never needs batteries, small, ergonomic, and looks cool. Not cheap, though. Also not usable for really low light.
 
I mostly just "guess" based on experience but I always carry a Weston Master V with the incident light thing, "Invercone" Weston calls it, in a belt pouch. I almost never take a reflected reading. Incident is the way to go.
 
Last edited:
my small sekonic meter works for me - I used to think I need to meter every shot, but it's easier to work, I think, by metering sparsely (for light and shadow) and figuring out the lighting changes mentally in between.

I agree - this is the best way to really get a good eye for light. I used to do it for years, and I noticed that when something really happened too fast for metering, I was still able to catch up. Obviously this was because I was doing a lot of metering in all conditions - you really get to know what types of weather gives what lightning conditions and so on.
 
Back
Top Bottom