Tom A
RFF Sponsor
I concur with the recommendation of the VC lenses - by far best "bang for the buck".
Both the 35f1.4 Nokton and the 40f1.4 with the bayonet filed down to give a 35 frame are extremely capable lenses.
The 35 will give you a "classic" M style image and the 40mm will do double duty as a 35 and 50 ( about 1 step back for 35 or 1 step forward for 50).
It all depends on where you are coming from - previous Rf experience or SLR.
The trick is to just get one lens now and decide later what you feel is missing. My recommendation is a 35f1.4 Nokton and a heap of film and shoot through the summer with that kit. Look at your negatives and decide if you want to add a wider lens or a short tele. Plenty of choices in both.
The 35f1.4 will allow you to "explore" low light as well as day light stuff with ease.
The Summilux 35f1.4 pre-asph is a good choice - but you are paying for the Leica name and it is a 40 year old design. The Nokton 35f1.4 is a better lens all around - and you will have a lot more money left over for film too.
As always - check on Flickr for what the "signature" is on the various lenses you are contemplating. It will not tell you resolution as the files are too small for that and most of the modern lenses are better than the film anyway - but it will give you a good idea of angles of view, contrast and flare.
Both the 35f1.4 Nokton and the 40f1.4 with the bayonet filed down to give a 35 frame are extremely capable lenses.
The 35 will give you a "classic" M style image and the 40mm will do double duty as a 35 and 50 ( about 1 step back for 35 or 1 step forward for 50).
It all depends on where you are coming from - previous Rf experience or SLR.
The trick is to just get one lens now and decide later what you feel is missing. My recommendation is a 35f1.4 Nokton and a heap of film and shoot through the summer with that kit. Look at your negatives and decide if you want to add a wider lens or a short tele. Plenty of choices in both.
The 35f1.4 will allow you to "explore" low light as well as day light stuff with ease.
The Summilux 35f1.4 pre-asph is a good choice - but you are paying for the Leica name and it is a 40 year old design. The Nokton 35f1.4 is a better lens all around - and you will have a lot more money left over for film too.
As always - check on Flickr for what the "signature" is on the various lenses you are contemplating. It will not tell you resolution as the files are too small for that and most of the modern lenses are better than the film anyway - but it will give you a good idea of angles of view, contrast and flare.