Huss
Veteran
why is the 0.58 more expensive and rare?
Leica made far fewer of them.
why is the 0.58 more expensive and rare?
is your m6 the classic 0.72?
I have no glasses and the 28mm frame lines of my 0.72 M6 were not comfortable for me at all. I sold my CV 28/3.5 because I rather use a 25/4 w/ external finder. The lens is great tho .. one of the best I had.
I have an M6 (classic, with 0.72 finder) and I have difficulties with my 35 mm lens (with glasses). I survive somehow and do not have much difficulties with framing, but I would perfer the 0.58 only for 35mm, not to speak of 28mm.
Maybe others have less problems, but I would recommend to try to find a camera to test it - with glasses on.
If you want a camera with a VF suitable for 28mm focal length, I would recommend the Hexar RF (0.6x VF) or even better the Bessa R4 (A or M).
I wear glasses and I require the .58 finder for a 28mm lens. I even find it helpful with a 35mm lens. There is no need for concern about focusing accuracy. I use the 28mm Summicron (f/2) and at this short focal length the .58 finder is well within the necessary accuracy.
Are you sure you want to start with a 28mm? The 35mm is an easy lens to learn to shoot with, and has a very natural angle of view, and works well enough with the .72 finder when wearing glasses if you don't get a .58 finder.
The other options, although I don't know if either suits your needs, would be either a ZI or a Bessa R4.
I dislike leica's 0.72 MP and M7.
After reading comments here and doing a little more research, I actually think this is what I'm going to do, start with a 35mm lens.
Unless through some stroke of luck, I'll probably get the 0.72 M6. If the 0.58 shows up, I'll snatch that one up instead but they seem almost impossibly rare.
Thanks again for all the input.