I have both the M8 and M9. It is fair to state that the M9 is better for color, "better" meaning not having to use IR cut filters to attain normal colors. High ISO is better on the M9 by 1~2 stops. IR cut filters introduce a set of problems with reflections and color shift that is avoided in the M9.
I will not be selling my M8, and will continue to use it. But between the M8 and M9, the latter is improved in several ways. Some of the improvements, such as displaying the most recently shot image- could be implemented on the M8 via firmware. Others, such as IR filtering and higher ISO performance- cannot.
Anyone interested in Digital M photography that does not want to drop $7K- an M8 is a great camera, and can be sold to receover most of the cost if you decide to upgrade. Or, upgrade to the M9 and use the M8 for a backup. For me- it will be used for Telephoto lenses where the crop factor is not a detriment. IR Cut filters are less of an optical issue with Telephoto lenses than they are with wide-angle lenses. the 1/8000 shutter speed is also an advantage.
I will not be selling my M8, and will continue to use it. But between the M8 and M9, the latter is improved in several ways. Some of the improvements, such as displaying the most recently shot image- could be implemented on the M8 via firmware. Others, such as IR filtering and higher ISO performance- cannot.
Anyone interested in Digital M photography that does not want to drop $7K- an M8 is a great camera, and can be sold to receover most of the cost if you decide to upgrade. Or, upgrade to the M9 and use the M8 for a backup. For me- it will be used for Telephoto lenses where the crop factor is not a detriment. IR Cut filters are less of an optical issue with Telephoto lenses than they are with wide-angle lenses. the 1/8000 shutter speed is also an advantage.
Last edited: