Rhodie
Established
Dust & Digi SLRs are a problem when operating in a dusty environment.
One particular geographical local that I regularly visit is particularly troublesome.
As a consequence when using digi SLRs I try to leave the same lens attached until I can be assured of a semi "clean" environment. Not ideal but better than smearing the sensor with a botched field clean.
Using Leicas in the same environment I have found the fine dust has a way of permeating its way within my M viewfinders, requiring an expensive service after assignments. Though this has been a nuisance - it obviously did not effect the shot film image.
With the M8 this is critical, as there appears to be no seal between the lens & body - thereby potentially exposing the sensor. I am expecting the viewfinder to be similarly susceptable to dust as previous Ms [6, 7 & MP] I use.
Field cleaning of sensors are not really an option, unless marked progess has been made in this science that I am unaware of.
Living in Bangkok and trying to get Canon to do this professionally is an issue in itself, with my 1Ds MkII being returned after a service & clean without its body cap! Entailing an immediate about turn & repeat of same. GRRR!
Leica here can do little but send a camera & lens to Singapore or Hong Kong.
Finally, has anyone seen a field report/test on the new 16/18/21 tri-elmar?
Having bought the original mark 1 28/35/50 version, which after a litany of problems was replaced by Leica for a mk2 I don't particularly want to be another guineapig in Leica's launch & redevelopment cycle.
I wondered whether it would be prudent to wait for sometime to see if there are any issues. Similarly, I suspect this caution might be applied to the pending M8.
Thoughts of those well-versed in Leica Digital would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Rhodie
One particular geographical local that I regularly visit is particularly troublesome.
As a consequence when using digi SLRs I try to leave the same lens attached until I can be assured of a semi "clean" environment. Not ideal but better than smearing the sensor with a botched field clean.
Using Leicas in the same environment I have found the fine dust has a way of permeating its way within my M viewfinders, requiring an expensive service after assignments. Though this has been a nuisance - it obviously did not effect the shot film image.
With the M8 this is critical, as there appears to be no seal between the lens & body - thereby potentially exposing the sensor. I am expecting the viewfinder to be similarly susceptable to dust as previous Ms [6, 7 & MP] I use.
Field cleaning of sensors are not really an option, unless marked progess has been made in this science that I am unaware of.
Living in Bangkok and trying to get Canon to do this professionally is an issue in itself, with my 1Ds MkII being returned after a service & clean without its body cap! Entailing an immediate about turn & repeat of same. GRRR!
Leica here can do little but send a camera & lens to Singapore or Hong Kong.
Finally, has anyone seen a field report/test on the new 16/18/21 tri-elmar?
Having bought the original mark 1 28/35/50 version, which after a litany of problems was replaced by Leica for a mk2 I don't particularly want to be another guineapig in Leica's launch & redevelopment cycle.
I wondered whether it would be prudent to wait for sometime to see if there are any issues. Similarly, I suspect this caution might be applied to the pending M8.
Thoughts of those well-versed in Leica Digital would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Rhodie