dpap
Member
I'm sorry, but what exactly are the innovations that make the M9 worth 3 times as much as an M8?
1) the crop factor 1.3x vs 1.0
2) 1 stop better ISO performance (remains to be seen)
3) no IR filters
for me, 1 does not really matter that much, especially if the M9 has higher noise in the corners, 3 I already have the IR filters, and for 2, well, for 5k I can afford to have faster lenses...
so, I don't really see the need to upgrade all that quickly...
now, if the M9 had similar high ISO performance to the D3x, without the corner vignetting, then we're talking. But as it seems so far, it doesn't really.
I almost wish they'd kept the MPix count to 10 while improving the high ISO performance...
1) the crop factor 1.3x vs 1.0
2) 1 stop better ISO performance (remains to be seen)
3) no IR filters
for me, 1 does not really matter that much, especially if the M9 has higher noise in the corners, 3 I already have the IR filters, and for 2, well, for 5k I can afford to have faster lenses...
so, I don't really see the need to upgrade all that quickly...
now, if the M9 had similar high ISO performance to the D3x, without the corner vignetting, then we're talking. But as it seems so far, it doesn't really.
I almost wish they'd kept the MPix count to 10 while improving the high ISO performance...