eleskin
Well-known
My M8 has more than satisfied my needs for 35mm film and medium format. However, large format, especially 8x10 still have unique qualities such as incredible resolution ( 1000 megapixels) tone, perspective control, depth of feild control, etc,,. My digital M is with me most of the time, but sometimes I have the bug or itch to pull the heavy artillery out and go for a 8"x10" negative. Anyone else here have similar feelings?
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Yes, I use formats up to 12x15 inch, but a trick I especially like is faking whole-plate contact prints with a 3x enlargement off Linhof 56x72mm.
Cheers,
R.
Cheers,
R.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
I shoot with an 8x10 on occasion, and still have an 11x14 which rarely gets used- it is an order of magnitude more expensive as well as being more difficult.
gdi
Veteran
Nothing larger than 4x5 for me. If i know I will want to print pretty large, or in B&W, I shoot that, or my mamiya 7ii, rather than an M9.
ChrisN
Striving
4x5 here: I can see a M9 replacing medium format (with the right lenses and technique) but not large format. Wet printing with both MF and LF negs is a joy not to be abandoned lightly.
Nope, I'm a small format guy. Haven't used large format in 20 years and only used it a little back then.
Tom Niblick
Well-known
Film? I have two 4x5s and 2 scanbacks - BetterLight and PhaseOne. I use a Toyo/BetterLight Super 6K with 2 North Light HID banks every day. It's the best tool for art reproduction.
Teuthida
Well-known
Sinar X. Looks good sitting in the corner on it's tripod. Damn hard to get the thing onto a plane in my carry-on, and I'm not crazy about TSA folks asking me to open my boxes of unexposed 4x5 film to see whats in em.