M9 Coding for Zeiss 35mm C-Biogon 2.8

[jsrockit]

I was wondering what Zeiss 35mm C-Biogon 2.8 owners are coding the lens as for use on the M9. What's working best?

 

[thrice]

35mm summicron asph.

If in doubt do your own tests with various 35mm settings and shoot a white wall, it's not rocket science.

 

[Bill Blackwell]

I was wondering what Zeiss 35mm C-Biogon 2.8 owners are coding the lens as for use on the M9. What's working best?

I would use the six-bit code for a 35mm Summarit, which will get you to the nearest wide-open aperture.

 

[leicashot]

I would use the six-bit code for a 35mm Summarit, which will get you to the nearest wide-open aperture.

That would be good if the Summarit code was available.....which I believe it isn't

 

[scottwallick]

That would be good if the Summarit code was available.....which I believe it isn't

You can read the codes off this shot from the Popflash store:

 

[kmallick]

6-bit code for C-Biogon 35mm

6-bit code for C-Biogon 35mm

I use he 6-bit code for Summarit-M 35mm f/2.5, which is 101011. I mostly use it for exif data rather than correction of any optical aberration. the C-Biogon 35mm is a fabulous lens.

 

[Bill Blackwell]

That would be good if the Summarit code was available.....which I believe it isn't

Look here (for future reference):

http://whimster-photography.com/leica_m_lens_codes/index.html

 

[jsrockit]

If in doubt do your own tests with various 35mm settings and shoot a white wall, it's not rocket science.

It might not be rocket science but it sure is boring. I don't shoot tests unless I think something is wrong.

 

[SDK]

If you want to pick a Leica profile from the menu in the M9, the 35mm f/2 11310/11311 one works fine.

 

[hellomikmik]

I don't code it, none of the menu options worked for me neither - I always had some color inconsistency around the edge (easy to see with lot of snow around). My solution is corrective profiles in C1. Many times I correct only the color cast and leave the vignetting to its own fate.

 

[Richard G]

Coding matters most for my 50 C Sonnar and for my 21 C Biogon. I've been coding 35 Summicron ASPH just because it's new and sharp! The Summicron profile produces indistinguishable results.

 

[EdwardKaraa]

Zeiss recommends 28/2.8 11804/11809.

 

[kennylovrin]

This is a bit of an old thread, but I just did a test shooting my wall and going through some codings and also using CornerFix.

Could be helpful for some perhaps!

http://kennylovrin.se/post/40917053720/finding-a-lens-coding-for-the-carl-zeiss-2-8-35-t-c

Kenny

 

[Richard G]

Thanks Kenny. Nice tests. I downloaded Corner Fix months ago and in my 10 day break I might learn how to use it for the 21 C Biogon.

 

[zleica]

That's very helpful! Thank you for sharing.

This is a bit of an old thread, but I just did a test shooting my wall and going through some codings and also using CornerFix.

Could be helpful for some perhaps!

http://kennylovrin.se/post/40917053720/finding-a-lens-coding-for-the-carl-zeiss-2-8-35-t-c

Kenny

 

[kennylovrin]

Thanks Kenny. Nice tests. I downloaded Corner Fix months ago and in my 10 day break I might learn how to use it for the 21 C Biogon.

Thanks!

I was a bit reluctant to dig into it, but I have to say the most worst part was taking the shot of the wall. 😉

CornerFix was very easy to then deal with when creating the profile for the lens - one click really. I have yet to try it in my normal workflow though - I'm a bit reluctant there, not really wanting to involve another app, which is why I am more leaning towards using a manual coding in camera to get rid of the color shifts but leave some of the vignetting. I think I could override the 28mm exif while importing perhaps.

As I'm using Aperture I also got the green tint on the CornerFix'ed images I tested with, so I had to enable the hack that appends "CornerFix" to the camera model EXIF, and I don't really like that either.