nobbylon
Veteran
After getting my M9-P to go Leica digital for a year I decided to take it along on my latest dive trip to Thailand. I took a Zeiss biogon-C 35 and a Zeiss 50 Planar. I prefer both these to any Leica equivelant I have or have had. Sharp with good colour and contrast and a nice pop to the pictures.
I found that the 35 would have been enough as I only used the 50 a few times. Camera freezes have been eradicated by waiting for the red light to stop flashing before doing anything. I suppose the writing process takes up electrical resources. Nearly 600 pics and not a hiccup.
Differences between previous trips,
1/ carrying and using the camera vs my D700 was a dream, light and strangely anonymous as a picture taker.
2/ I found that I was using as a film M rather than a digital camera
3/ it's a pain in the backside waiting for the camera to write when used to instantaneous Nikon.
I took 2 batteries and power was never an issue. Humidity was very high especially on the dive boat and only time will tell if the constant damp has had an effect on the sensor glass but despite this the camera functioned normally with me dripping all over it a lot of the time!
I've decided on Aperture as my workflow partner for the M9 with subsequent tweaks in PS6 and so far I'm really impressed with the colour output. Bright reds seem to over saturate but it's an easy fix.
Would I take it and the 35 as my travel camera above my Nikons and compacts? I hate to admit it especially as I've been a digital M basher in the past but yes I would.
I'll post a link to some pics when I've finished editing them,
regards john
I found that the 35 would have been enough as I only used the 50 a few times. Camera freezes have been eradicated by waiting for the red light to stop flashing before doing anything. I suppose the writing process takes up electrical resources. Nearly 600 pics and not a hiccup.
Differences between previous trips,
1/ carrying and using the camera vs my D700 was a dream, light and strangely anonymous as a picture taker.
2/ I found that I was using as a film M rather than a digital camera
3/ it's a pain in the backside waiting for the camera to write when used to instantaneous Nikon.
I took 2 batteries and power was never an issue. Humidity was very high especially on the dive boat and only time will tell if the constant damp has had an effect on the sensor glass but despite this the camera functioned normally with me dripping all over it a lot of the time!
I've decided on Aperture as my workflow partner for the M9 with subsequent tweaks in PS6 and so far I'm really impressed with the colour output. Bright reds seem to over saturate but it's an easy fix.
Would I take it and the 35 as my travel camera above my Nikons and compacts? I hate to admit it especially as I've been a digital M basher in the past but yes I would.
I'll post a link to some pics when I've finished editing them,
regards john