Calzone
Gear Whore #1
I just developed some HP5 in ID-11 at 1:1. I was surprised at the nice moderate level of contrast in my negatives with this modern lens. Generally I tend to perfer old glass that is single coated, but I like how this relatively new lens tones down the contrast of bright afternoon sun.
But indoors the performance was less than stellar. Almost seemed like I underexposed by two stops. I think I got the hang of cupping the VF and using AEL mode, but indoors is it better to go to full manual exposure? I also realize that with the 50 wide-angle there is a bit of center weighting happening, where with a 75mm normal there isn't. Any hints on getting a better exposure indoors. Seems like I'm missing something.
I love shooting a 28/3.5 Canon/Seranar on a Leica IIIG, but I find that I have to overcome the physical size barrier of the Mamiya 6 and get as close as I get with the IIIG. This is a very sharp lens that gives great detail.
Thanks in advance.
Cal
But indoors the performance was less than stellar. Almost seemed like I underexposed by two stops. I think I got the hang of cupping the VF and using AEL mode, but indoors is it better to go to full manual exposure? I also realize that with the 50 wide-angle there is a bit of center weighting happening, where with a 75mm normal there isn't. Any hints on getting a better exposure indoors. Seems like I'm missing something.
I love shooting a 28/3.5 Canon/Seranar on a Leica IIIG, but I find that I have to overcome the physical size barrier of the Mamiya 6 and get as close as I get with the IIIG. This is a very sharp lens that gives great detail.
Thanks in advance.
Cal