It seems Canon is moving out the 1st generation EOS M at a big discount - probably to make way for the 2nd generation.
http://www.exposureguide.com/equipm...a-with-ef-m-22mm-f2-stm-lens-for-299-300-off/
Half off - $599 to $299
Stephen
http://www.exposureguide.com/equipm...a-with-ef-m-22mm-f2-stm-lens-for-299-300-off/
Half off - $599 to $299
Stephen
back alley
IMAGES
old news stephen...
aizan
Veteran
autofocus seems decent with the new firmware. could be a good deal.
old 1.0.6
http://youtu.be/VY2hRzGlN30
new 2.0.2
http://youtu.be/RlQ1pQ4LDUs
old 1.0.6
http://youtu.be/VY2hRzGlN30
new 2.0.2
http://youtu.be/RlQ1pQ4LDUs
iamzip
Ambitious, but rubbish
:bang:SONOFABITCH! I just got my Pentax Q!:bang:
GaryLH
Veteran
Well did not take long.. The sale at 299 maybe started a week ago and it looks like Amazon and b&h are already sold out of remaining inventory.
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/canon-m-and-ricoh-gxr-replacements-likely-coming-soon/
Gary
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/canon-m-and-ricoh-gxr-replacements-likely-coming-soon/
Gary
Eric T
Well-known
It seems Canon is moving out the 1st generation EOS M at a big discount - probably to make way for the 2nd generation.
http://www.exposureguide.com/equipm...a-with-ef-m-22mm-f2-stm-lens-for-299-300-off/
Half off - $599 to $299
Stephen
I think it is just as likely that Canon will halt their foray into the mirrorless realm. They took a bath on the EOS-M, a subpar product. In addition, mirrorless sales over all are stagnant and DSLR sales are climbing. So I suspect that Canon executives may be in denial about the fact that WOS-M simply wasn't competitive and come to the conclusion that it failed solely because the mirrorless market is down.
I hope Canon makes a second generation EOS-M but I wouldn't bet on it.
back alley
IMAGES
i think mark 2 is ready to ship...just waiting on the originals to sell now...
it's a solid camera that will be reworked a bit.
if canon would buy a better sensor instead of using their own that would help.
it's a solid camera that will be reworked a bit.
if canon would buy a better sensor instead of using their own that would help.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Why does such a highly respected very capable manufacturer struggle in this particular market. The Sigma series with all it's flaws and quirks garners more attention!
I've never been a Canon fan personally but I'm a little puzzled at their lack of success while Fuji, Sony etc, seem to be running away with it!
I've never been a Canon fan personally but I'm a little puzzled at their lack of success while Fuji, Sony etc, seem to be running away with it!
Mackinaw
Think Different
For $300.00, I bought one. Of course it's back-ordered for a few weeks, but for that price, I couldn't resist.
I already own a OM-D so I'm curious as to how the two cameras will compare. Looking forward to finding out.
Jim B.
I already own a OM-D so I'm curious as to how the two cameras will compare. Looking forward to finding out.
Jim B.
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
I think you'll find that the new sensor technology in their just-announced 70D is quite the ticket for mirrorless cameras. I wouldn't be counting Canon out of this market just yet. Rather the opposite would be my guess.i think mark 2 is ready to ship...just waiting on the originals to sell now...
it's a solid camera that will be reworked a bit.
if canon would buy a better sensor instead of using their own that would help.
...Mike
P.S. Full disclosure: I'm currently using another not-much-loved Canon mirrorless camera (a Canon G1 X, with a slightly larger than 4/3rds sensor). It's not a bad little camera, for all it's faults.
P.P.S. dpReview pointer to video(s) on Canon's 70D:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/07/03/canon-videos-show-70d-focusing
Last edited:
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
Why does such a highly respected very capable manufacturer struggle in this particular market. The Sigma series with all it's flaws and quirks garners more attention!
I've never been a Canon fan personally but I'm a little puzzled at their lack of success while Fuji, Sony etc, seem to be running away with it!
It boils down to lame marketing. Canon is a brand that is hardly instinctively attractive if you want to be different - they are as middle of the road as can be, even Nikon is perceived as less mainstream. If they want to sell something new and different, they'd have to promote it aggressively, even against their own legacy product lines. But going by the lame and scarce promotion they did, Canon presumably tied the hands of their mirrorless department when it comes to advertising and don't allow them to position themselves as a competition to DSLRs, fearing their shareholders more than a failure of the EOS-M series.
Sony on the other hand had no option but to position their mirrorless (as well as their solid mirror SLRs) agressively against their (as well as anybody else's) plain old DSLRs - the latter did not sell all that well, and with the company struggling as a whole they cannot afford immobility in the market any more. Fuji have nothing they could take business away from, so they can do as they like. And the Sigmas are weird, but some people love to be perversely against the mainstream - they'd probably still sell if they were even worse, as long as they remain the only ones to use that odd sensor.
GaryLH
Veteran
http://photorumors.com/2013/07/07/canon-eos-m-listed-as-no-longer-available/#more-46150
Well here is an interesting update for u canon guys. 2 new bodies. A update based on current 18mp tech and one later in year based on the newer 20mp tech. But the more interesting part of the rumor is what they are calling a reducer for ef lenses.. Is that to make a 50 a 50 like the metabones?
Gary
Well here is an interesting update for u canon guys. 2 new bodies. A update based on current 18mp tech and one later in year based on the newer 20mp tech. But the more interesting part of the rumor is what they are calling a reducer for ef lenses.. Is that to make a 50 a 50 like the metabones?
Gary
kshapero
South Florida Man
I just sold my Q for $20 and have replaced it with an APS-C sensor for only $100 difference.:bang:SONOFABITCH! I just got my Pentax Q!:bang:
I am not really a digital guy but it does come in handy.
Ruhayat
Well-known
I was surprised to find that I really liked mine. It was good enough for me that it replaced THREE cameras: Ricoh GXR, Canon 5D and Pentax K5. It is now my only digital camera. The fact that it can do both video and stills with high image quality in a compact package, and had both pleasing colour and B&W jpegs, were the deciding factors. But I normally just shoot static or slow moving subjects these days - for fast action I still use my Canon Elan 7e and Leica M's.
Test shot from 75mm Heliar Classic 1.8 on Canon EOS-M, showing off the sharpness and smoothness:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/97682169@N08/9265049673/sizes/o/in/photostream/
Test shot from 75mm Heliar Classic 1.8 on Canon EOS-M, showing off the sharpness and smoothness:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/97682169@N08/9265049673/sizes/o/in/photostream/
Attachments
user237428934
User deletion pending
P.S. Full disclosure: I'm currently using another not-much-loved Canon mirrorless camera (a Canon G1 X, with a slightly larger than 4/3rds sensor). It's not a bad little camera, for all it's faults.
What faults? The only thing that is missing in my point of view is a usable auto iso function.
Ruhayat
Well-known
If I may just add, the 22mm lens and touchscreen interface is a great combo for fuss free shooting. Just tap the screen and lens will focus and take a shot. The lens is actually very, very good, too.
jarski
Veteran
What faults? The only thing that is missing in my point of view is a usable auto iso function.
Laggy autofocus is still my biggest complaint, after using g1x for a year. Not big enough of a problem to switch, but am getting other camera for fast paced situations.
Haven't had any issue with auto iso. It could be more configurable, but not unusable in its current form.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Have you upgraded the firmware that speeds up Autofocs quite a bit.Laggy autofocus is still my biggest complaint, after using g1x for a year. Not big enough of a problem to switch, but am getting other camera for fast paced situations.
Haven't had any issue with auto iso. It could be more configurable, but not unusable in its current form.
Addy101
Well-known
The quys over at digitalrev did a little AF test: video. It surely improved, but it still is the worst AF of the bunch. Maybe the new Canon sensor makes the coming versions much better.
@Ruhayat: did you ever tried a Sony Nex, Samsung NX or any of the m4/3 offerings? I expect you would've been happy with any of these....
@Ruhayat: did you ever tried a Sony Nex, Samsung NX or any of the m4/3 offerings? I expect you would've been happy with any of these....
jarski
Veteran
Have you upgraded the firmware that speeds up Autofocs quite a bit.
We were a bit ot from eos-m to g1x, which does not have any updates (?).
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.