infrequent
Well-known
@fdigital - what is the differentiation between the E3 and say the other olympus camers such as the E4xx or E5xx? since the sensor size is the same what's the value add with the E3?
How would you handle such a big lens on such a small camera? The whole point of the micro 4/3's concept appears to be to produce pocket size dslr's.
@fdigital - what is the differentiation between the E3 and say the other olympus camers such as the E4xx or E5xx? since the sensor size is the same what's the value add with the E3?
Guys,
here we are trying to seriously discuss cameras that have not even been introduced, and with ZERO real world feedback from their users.
I mean, how useful can this discussion be with such a lack of data?
Anyone want to argue about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Stephen
Guys,
here we are trying to seriously discuss cameras that have not even been introduced, and with ZERO real world feedback from their users.
I mean, how useful can this discussion be with such a lack of data?
Anyone want to argue about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Stephen
I think the idea is to get rid of the mirror, so it won't be a "reflex" camera any more. Once you do that, then you can shrink the camera quite a bit while keeping the sensor size the same.How would you handle such a big lens on such a small camera? The whole point of the micro 4/3's concept appears to be to produce pocket size dslr's.
Huge numbers of us, at one time or another in our lives, have been involved in serious and hopeful discussions about the perfect woman.
Isn't that unrealistic and theoretical, not to mention a serious lack of data.
I would also like to think that engineers and design people are fed information from these types of discussions. Mayhaps not, but it's nice to be hopeful.
I don't need digital anything, and that isn't bashing. It's stating a fact that applies to myself and nobody else.