migrating flickr photos to google+?

sevres_babylone said:
I would agree with you, except the syndicated services paragraphs seems to go beyond that:

“You agree that this license includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services.”
Click to expand...

That, I believe, relates to content distribution networks and the like that powers the services that these sites provide.

It sounds nefarious, but it isn't. IANAL, but this is my understanding of how these rights work out.
 
hteasley said:
That, I believe, relates to content distribution networks and the like that powers the services that these sites provide.

It sounds nefarious, but it isn't. IANAL, but this is my understanding of how these rights work out.
Click to expand...

You're probably right. I've slowly started posting some images there.

Although the legal discussion is interesting, I've decided to focus my attention on making images that people will want to steal.
 
certifiable said:
Well I for one don't...
Click to expand...

++1

Took a look and the presentation and it just does not do much for me. I did not take a long look, only looked at the link in the post:

mabelsound said:
Sure--here's the "Best of 2010" gallery I just posted.
https://plus.google.com/photos/117208918921043466005/albums/5640759395279548657

I have been using G+ very differently from, say, facebook. facebook I use to keep in touch with friends and family, period--I don't friend anyone whom I don't actually know. Whereas G+ I am keeping public--using it as kind of a microblog or enhanced version of twitter. It's an open forum on the work I and my peers do. (I mostly post about literature and writing.) And it's nice to think I could integrate my photography with that. Anyway, we'll see how it goes.
Click to expand...

I just did not like the page layout.

. . . . . choices is what makes the world go round.

I'll be sticking with Flickr for the time being.
 
Last edited:
tapesonthefloor said:
While the subject of "Flickr replacement" keeps coming up, has anyone made the switch to 500px? Seems like an attractive interface.
Click to expand...

It seems 500px is lacking a group-function too. That makes finding interesting photos not so easy. It seems that it's completely built around the idea of rating a photo. I just want to have a place for my photo and not a continuous competition.
 
In both 500px and G+ (thanks for the invite, John [mabelsound]) photo albums, you can't specify tags for the whole set without having to do it one photo at a time ??

Serious oversight if that's the case.
 
Last edited:
Just a note on the posted link for the blog article concerning Google+'s ToS, make sure to check out the links in the comments. Apparently the blogger mentioned in this thread willingly omitted some important parts. This petapixel article has some good points and references for the issues.

On a personal note, I'm not totally impressed by google+'s picture layout and interactive features. Once you are in "theater" mode or whatever that is called on their site, it looks like a rip of nexGen for wordpress sites. The initial layout is interesting but not enough for me to advocate or indulge in migration from flickr. Flickr just does something for me I cannot find in other sites and it does it without the usual petty social interactions that happen in facebook, myspace, google+, etc.

OP: Good thread, glad you got me looking into all this. Time for a blog article for PCV on it! Thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom