Minolta MC 50mm f1.4 Rokkor PG

photophorous

Registered User
Local time
3:32 AM
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Messages
383
I found out a few months ago that my old Minolta X-370 still works so I've been bargain shopping. I just received this 50mm lens from KEH. It was a BGN coded lens and per the usual reports, it looks great. Glass is perfect...seriously 100% perfect...not a speck of dust. There are some scratchs on the barrel, but who cares. I can't wait to give it a try. Anyone here use this lens? Am I in for a treat?

I'm thinking seriously about getting a 24mm f2.8 Rokkor. I was going to buy a 25/4 Snapshot Skopar for my Bessa, but the Rokkor is half the price and everyone seems to think it's great. I don't suppose anyone here has used both?

Paul
 
Yes, I have both.
Cutting-edge optics from the 70's-80's.
I prefer the older ones, they are "heavy metal".
The 24mm came later. Most all are MD.

Enjoy!

-Dan
 
MD W Rokker 24 is a shared designed with floating elements also used by Leica for the R series. It is a great lens. I don't think it is much less expensive that the CV 25 though. The CV is pretty inexpensive.
 
Since we are talking Rokkor Files, give in and get the W Rokkor X MD 35/1.8 too.

http://www.rokkorfiles.com/35mm.htm

My kit is 24, 35, MC 58/1.2, 85/1.7, 100/2.5 and then I have a 135, 200 and 300 too of some sort, but the 24, 35, 58 and one of the short teles is my main kit.
 
I have thought about the 35 BUT its third in line for adding to my Minolta kit. want to get a SRT Super (WITH mirror l/up) first followed by an 85!

Plus I already have the 35/2.5 Scopar on my Bessa R!
 
Photophorus I like what you can capture with the 24mm!

2025893938_92ee65e982.jpg
 
I have the 50mm rokkor-x, they are all great lenses, there is something about the minolta lenses that always put them apart from the rest of the crowd. You are in for a treat indeed.

Oh and that picture of a dog, thats great!
 
Last edited:
I've owned most of the Rokkor-X lens since the 60's including 2 50mm f/1.4 MC lens.

You will be pleasantly surprised by the outstanding quality of this lens..
 
photophorous said:
I found out a few months ago that my old Minolta X-370 still works so I've been bargain shopping. I just received this 50mm lens from KEH. It was a BGN coded lens and per the usual reports, it looks great. Glass is perfect...seriously 100% perfect...not a speck of dust. There are some scratchs on the barrel, but who cares. I can't wait to give it a try. Anyone here use this lens? Am I in for a treat?

I'm thinking seriously about getting a 24mm f2.8 Rokkor. I was going to buy a 25/4 Snapshot Skopar for my Bessa, but the Rokkor is half the price and everyone seems to think it's great. I don't suppose anyone here has used both?

Paul

This is the BOKEH on the Rokkor 50mm 1.4
worm.jpg
 
Wow, thanks everyone! I'm really excited to give it a try now. That shot of the dog is great and thanks for the bokeh shot, Eric.

Paul
 
grainy_shadows said:
i have a md 50mm f/1.4 is there a difference between this one and the mc versions?

The MD lenses were redesigned to be used on the XD-11, X-700 and cameras which had the fully automatic mode. MC lenses could be used on these bodies in manual and Aperture Priority mode, but not shutter priority and full auto. In many cases the optical formulas were unchanged, though over time there were some changes. Generally as the time went on Minolta went to building lenses with plastic components away from the heavy metal of the early MC line. Also, throughout their run, Minolta made many improvements to the coatings in their lenses, so an MD lens would have different/better coatings than an early MC lens.
 
Back
Top Bottom