JasperD
Member
Looks like Fuji indeed delivered last weekend. Here´s hoping the same will hold true for us! :bang:
Samples from Yodobashi with all three lenses:
http://photo.yodobashi.com/fujix/imp/xpro1.html
Some other gallery:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/minami/sets/72157629356684095/with/6891267337/
Samples from Yodobashi with all three lenses:
http://photo.yodobashi.com/fujix/imp/xpro1.html
Some other gallery:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/minami/sets/72157629356684095/with/6891267337/
Richard G
Veteran
The 18mm looks great. I still need to see how this all works, aperture selection, method of stopping down for the shot v illumination of EVF for framing, but I can't see me not buying this.
maddoc
... likes film again.
While at Lemonsha (Ginza) I saw a guy buying the X-Pro1 last Saturday.
Oh, so this was released in Japan? Good, that means elsewhere we should meet the late March delivery date.
Avotius
Some guy
Looks pretty darn good. I love Fuji's digital colors and I am glad to see they are still cracking along. If I was not already invested in the micro4/3 system I would seriously consider one of these..........then again im not THAT invested in m4/3..... 
paulfish4570
Veteran
i much like mr. yodobashi's photo style ...
celluloidprop
Well-known
I can't wait to get this in my hands. I've come to find that test photos tell me nothing of if a camera is good for me or not.
bruceh
Member
regularchickens
Well-known
When I pixel-peep these at 100%, they look like Tri-X in 35mm. Without dust. I can't wait.
Benjamin Marks
Veteran
Like the colors; I am surprised at the number of photos with veiling flare (35/1.4). There is one image (clock tower) where it looks as if the point of the image was to induce flare, but in the others it just looks like a side effect. I am still intrigued by the camera, but am surprised at this optical effect.
Others reactions?
Ben
Others reactions?
Ben
samuelphoto
Established
Yep.
Yep.
Agree. This was a definite problem with my X100 which is why I sent it back. My understanding is that this is caused by light reflecting off the sensor back into the lens, which makes perfect sense to me. I hope the X-Pro1 is better in this regard...
For some reason, my M6 and M lenses still perform flawlessly, no surprises, ever. If processing and scanning wasn't so expensive, they'd still be part of my primary workflow, but at about $25/roll for film, processing and scanning, it's prohibitive for general use.
Yep.
Like the colors; I am surprised at the number of photos with veiling flare (35/1.4). There is one image (clock tower) where it looks as if the point of the image was to induce flare, but in the others it just looks like a side effect. I am still intrigued by the camera, but am surprised at this optical effect.
Others reactions?
Ben
Agree. This was a definite problem with my X100 which is why I sent it back. My understanding is that this is caused by light reflecting off the sensor back into the lens, which makes perfect sense to me. I hope the X-Pro1 is better in this regard...
For some reason, my M6 and M lenses still perform flawlessly, no surprises, ever. If processing and scanning wasn't so expensive, they'd still be part of my primary workflow, but at about $25/roll for film, processing and scanning, it's prohibitive for general use.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.