my minoltas...the good, the bad & the ugly!

back alley

IMAGES
Local time
4:11 PM
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
41,288
Location
true north strong & free
the good?
those lenses are some sharp!

the bad?
light leaks on one body...frame registration & unintended double exposures on the other!

the ugly?
i shot kodak 400bcn film at 200 and it's very contrasty!!

9086023451_6b6d483587_c.jpg


9086030395_af969c13e1_c.jpg


9086037853_01abff4cd8_c.jpg


9086050495_3d3cb49534_c.jpg


9088274966_5cccf55d83_c.jpg


9086064959_6f6bc00ae3_c.jpg
 
Add another body Get an srt101? 😛

The first shot is great. Just plain funny in terms of the various expressions.

Gary
 
What about the unusual poses in the first photo? That ain't zumba.

that's the 'dodge squad'! they walk around downtown with a videographer putting money in expired parking meters! and if lucky, they catch the car driver and interview him...that's what happened to me! i signed a release and might wind up in a car commercial!
 
the ugly?
i shot kodak 400bcn film at 200 and it's very contrasty!!


I don't use Kodak 400BCN film, but if my TMax 100 came out too contrasty with a certain camera/lens, I would say that it was overexposed/overdeveloped -- maybe you can try shooting this film at a higher EI ?
 
I don't use Kodak 400BCN film, but if my TMax 100 came out too contrasty with a certain camera/lens, I would say that it was overexposed/overdeveloped -- maybe you can try shooting this film at a higher EI ?

my mistake was exposing/developing it like I did ilford xp2...I always shot it at 200 and had it processed normally and liked the results.

I bought xp2 today...
 
I took a diversion into Minolta cameras when I thought trying to rebuild a Nikon outfit was going to be too expensive. Great cameras when they work right, but that has more to do with their age than anything else, Joe (like me). A decent two body kit is light, due to the advanced construction methods Minolta used. And most of the lenses are good performers.

I've always shot BW400CN at box, and had it processed that way, as it is contrasty enough already. Came in handy when testing a camera I didn't have the proper size yellow filter for.

PF
 
the black xd11 gave me 2 shots with a light leak just right of centre...odd that it would be only 2 frames, no? they were not in sequence but they were both with the 35mm.

the chrome xd11 needed to be advanced twice before stopping...i think i needed to advance the lever all the way and didn't...this resulted in 2 double exposed frames and 2 frames that were not in register. this was close to the end of the roll.

tomorrow i go out with the black xd11 and just the 35 for some street shooting and to see what happens.
 
the black xd11 gave me 2 shots with a light leak just right of centre...odd that it would be only 2 frames, no? they were not in sequence but they were both with the 35mm.

the chrome xd11 needed to be advanced twice before stopping...i think i needed to advance the lever all the way and didn't...this resulted in 2 double exposed frames and 2 frames that were not in register. this was close to the end of the roll.

tomorrow i go out with the black xd11 and just the 35 for some street shooting and to see what happens.
Joe,
because the camera design doesn't rely on the lens to prevent light leaks, only to set the correct aperture via proper operation, the lens fitted won't play any part in the film fogging.

The shutter speed setting might, though, if the second curtain is sticking at a particular speed. Did you use the same speed for both the affected shots? If so: that's the clue to ascertaining the fault. I've tinkered with an SRT shutter (last week) but not an XD11. Those who have may be able to offer more specific remedies.
Cheers,
Brett
 
Back
Top Bottom