my new ikon + nokton 35 f1.2 arrived: initial thoughts and observations (very long!)

papasnap

Well-known
Local time
2:30 AM
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
207
Location
Melbourne, Australia
hola all, yesterday I recieved my brand new black zeiss ikon and new black voigtlander nokton 35mm f1.2. I'll share some of my thoughts and experiences, hopefully they may be of use/interest to someone. As it's my first proper rangefinder (an old Yashica GSN with a cloudy RF notwithstanding), some of my observations will be on rangefinders generally, and some on the ikon specifically. Sorry if this is excessively long, but I know I always want to read as much as I possibly can about others experiences and recommendations before I buy something, so I'll be as detailed as possible.

QUICK SUMMARY
I've come to very much enjoy and respect both the ikon and the nokton, they've raised quite a few challenges and issues but overall i've found the combo extremely rewarding and engaging in the short time I've had it. I think they are going to be a real asset in acheiving the kind of photography I aim to do.

BACKGROUND
I ordered the ikon from matsuiyastore in japan (http://stores.ebay.com/Matsuiyastore) and the nokton from chiif cameras in singapore (http://www.chiifcameras.com/). Both sellers were a pleasure to deal with, and I wouldn't hesitate to deal with either of them again. I live in sydney, australia and having ordered the items on last sunday, the nokton arrived on thursday and the ikon on friday.

my path to the ikon started when I read about the nokton. I shoot mostly late at night in very poor light, and in general I really dislike flash almost all of the time. When I was using my nikon DSLR (a D70s with sigma 30mm f1.4 = 45mm with the 1.5 sensor crop), I always wanted better low light capabilities and a slightly wider FOV. When I was using my Hexar AF (which I utterly loved, despite some acknowledged limitations), I would have liked a faster lens and better manual control of exposure (all it would really need would be a dedicated exposure lock button for use in AE or P modes).

Once I read about the 35mm nokton f1.2 it was clear this was the lens for me, so then I went about picking the right body to best use it. It was down to either a Leica M6 TTL (.58 or .72) or the zeiss, and I went with the zeiss for the longer rangefinder base, apperture priority mode, larger and apparently more eyeglass-friendly viewfinder, display of actual shutter speed in finder, arguably easier film loading, and the fact I can buy a brand new ZI for the same or less price than a used M6 TTL. In nearly every category I was assessing bodies in, the zeiss rated highest for me. I considered the Hexar RF as well, but discounted it as like the .58x M6 I was concerned about it's ability to focus very fast lenses (f1.2 or faster) accurately.

I've been set on the ikon and nokton for a long time, and with an impending 4 month trip to thailand, now was the time to finally get it. I'm leaving in late april, so I've got some time to get used to the system before I go.

Please keep in mind I've only had the ikon + nokton for around 24 hours, so my experience with it is still very limited. I'm 34 shots into the first roll (Provia 400X pushed one stop to 800), and haven't seen any developed results yet. On the plus side, I really put it through it's paces during this time, in particular at a hectic house party, so I've gotten a feel for it's handling and usage in difficult situations.


CHALLENGES AND ISSUES (NEGATIVES)
1. When working quickly, and particularly in poor light, I find it a challenge to keep my eye centered over the viewfinder. It happens especially when shooting with the camera vertical instead of horizontal. Due to the design of the Ikon RF, you need to keep your eye closely centred or the RF patch dissapears and you can't use it to focus. I think that this is something that will improve with time and experience.

2. I'm still not completely sure that my rangefinder is aligned, although a quick check at infinity focus seems to indicate things are on target. I'm new to rangefinders so it's hard for me to say, and I've heard that the ZI can often appear out of alignment but actually be working fine. Yesterday I ran into a acquantance/friend who's also an RFF member, and he looked through the finder and almost immediately said that the RF was out of alignment, but then checked again more carefully and wasn't so sure. When helping break up a fight at the party last night (it was pretty hectic), the ikon apparently got dropped or swung very hard into the floor or wall, which severly bent/dented the lovely LH-3 vented hood for the nokton. Hopefully that didn't mess with the alignment, I guess I'll soon see.

3. The entire RF patch has a very minor but still noticible upwards diagonal angle (just a couple of degrees off horizontal) compared to the framelines - it's like someone twisted it upwards just a little. It won't bother me in the slightest, as long as it's doesn't cause any focus innacuracy.

4. When looking through the finder while wearing glasses, I find I can't keep both the RF patch centred/visible and read the LED meter readout (on the left of the finder) at the same time. It's not a problem when I'm not wearing glasses. In time I think I'll get better at the quick shuffle repositioning my eye from one to the other, without losing my centring on the RF (see issue 1). In the mean time, i've found that when shooting very rapidly, I tend to simply have to trust the AE has the right value.

5. I'm still getting used to focusing with a rangefinder. In particular, I struggled a lot in tracking someone standing right next to me (about arms length away, near minimum focus) who is talking rapidly and moving their head around a lot in animated conversation - I found I had to wait for the moment when the person finishes what they are saying and pauses to listen to the other person, at which point they (generally) stop moving for a second or two. I'll get better in time but I think this situation is always going to be a struggle with an RF when working wide open with shallow DOF. Situations like that were a complete non-issue with the Hexar AF, with it's very quick and positive active IR focusing.



phew! Ok, that's it on negatives for now. I can't comment on the metering just yet. I plan to update this post/thread next weekend, once I've got some results back and looked at the slides under the loupe.

POSITIVES AND GENERAL COMMENTS
1. With all the fancy glass densely packed inside it, the nokton is suprisingly heavy ( in a pleasing way) for it's compact size, weighing in at about half a kilo. The build quality seems absolutely solid, and gives a sense of quality I haven't felt since trying out the big zeiss primes for my father's contax 645 system. By the way, I say compact relative to the SLR world. It's the same width but about 30 - 40% longer than my little Nikkor 50mm F1.8 AF lens, and the same length but about 40% thinner than my Sigma 30mm F1.4 AF lens (and that's not even full frame). If I hollowed out my Nikkor 18-70mm AFS zoom, I could easily fit the nokton inside it. Overall, the size of the ikon + nokton seems to be about the same (from memory) as say an old pentax spotmatic with 50mm prime lens. When the nokton is mounted on the ikon, the two together have a pleasing heft and feeling of solidity. Compared to the luxurious weight of an old leica M3 (which I've only held briefly), I think I find the weight of the ikon to be more practical.

2. This one matters a lot to me - when wearing the ikon + nokton with the standard zeiss shoulder strap, the camera sits on my body very easily and comfortably, flat against my torso. This means that I can comfortably wear the camera for extended periods without any annoyance, which in turn means I'm much more likely to have it out and ready to go when I need it at zero notice. In fact as I sit here writing this, I've got the pair over one shoulder and under the other, sitting on my stomache comfortably. This is in stark contrast to my Nikon D70S, especially when it's got the 30mm f1.4 prime on it.


3. It's a small point, but the standard shoulder strap for the ikon has a wonderfully grippy rubberised shoulder pad, that means that most of the time the camera remains sitting against your body at whatever position you left it at. This means that I can eg ride a bike while wearing it, or keep it high and close, ready to take a shot quickly. It'll be a shame to loose this if/when I get a leather half case with leather strap.

4. The Ikon and the Nokton are both a joy to look at and to hold. Neither has an especially aesthetically pleasing design, but they both look very understated, clean and functional to my eye. The black finish is very practical and handsome on both. The nokton is wonderfully tactile, and the ikon isn't far behind it. I'm planning on getting a leather half case (likely from luigi) to make holding the ikon even more comfortable, although it would be a shame to lose the sure grip you can get on the ikons rubberised body.

5. The viewfinder on the ikon is, as expected, wonderfully large and clear. The only downside to this is that it's a long way for your eye to travel from the RF patch to the metering readout, I do wish they'd put the meter readout inside the 35mm frame instead of the 28mm frame, but it's not a showstopper issue. The overall experience is definately pleasant.

6. The shutter sound is of course louder than my old virtually silent Hexar AF, but it's still very mild. It also has a reassuring sound and feel to it. I really don't think it's ever going to be a problem for me in practical use.

7. The overall ergonomics and usability of the camera rates as very intuitive and very positive. I think I'll get to grips with it very quickly and find it practical and rewarding for many many years to come. Other photographer friends/family who handle the combo are immediately impressed and get a wisftul look in their eyes.

8. Although I find the nokton extremely managable in size, I think I'll follow it up in a few months with either a voigtlander 35 f2.5 pancake II or the new 35 f1.4 nokton, or maybe even the Zeiss Biogon 35mm f2 for daytime and casual use. I don't regret getting the nokton f1.2 at all, as for my most important work there's no better substitute for it in any lens mount (canon, nikon, leica, etc).

9. The combo fits very well into my little black Domke F803 satchel, and makes for a fantastic system I can carry with me everywhere.

10. Just FYI, my next lens purchase will be a 25mm, either the zeiss or the voightlander.


Well - that's it for now. I'll have more observations to make once I've got some concrete results back. I really, really hope the alignment is correct! But even if it's not, and I have to send it back, in this short time the system has made such a positive impression on me that I'll happily wait and get it right.

If you have any questions, please let me know - keep in mind i'm likely to be slow to reply, as I'm very busy throughout the week.

Cheers!
Tom
 
Boy, first night with your new camera and already involved in a bar fight! Tough!
Wonder how the camera will look like in 6 month time😉

My dream combo. Seems like I'll need to save some cash... Post your pics please, we are curious.

Take care 😉
- Michael
 
papasnap

This combo is my low light rig. You will get over the eye positioning thing after a day or two, for me it has become automatic. You will also get over the eye hunting for the speed display soon. Just trust the AE unless you are shooting against the sky or against a light source, and in this case use the AE lock button before. You will learn to asess the shutter speed with your ear. For the RF accuracy, point the camera at the moon, if it is OK at infinity, you are fine. I also recommend you to shoot a ruler from 1 meter distance at 45° to make sure your close focus is nailed. Before you invest in a next lens (get the Biogon if you want a better 35mm for shooting outside) get a half case - the best for this rig is Luigi's case with grip, expensive, but feels really great and the grip helps with the vertical shots - also the strap has protections for the metal rings, this way you will not consume the body around the lugs.

This combination is terribly versatile in interiors

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1074/1162454351_4ec716d14c.jpg?v=0

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2155/1794807300_0c82908851.jpg?v=0

(both of the above shots were made wide open)

but can be confidently used at f11 for zone focused street work:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2119/1794219221_a95df8e891.jpg?v=0

or at any other aperture you like for general purpose photography:

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1050/1032442528_f507681faa.jpg?v=0

Mind you - I prefer to shoot B&W, but also in colour this lens is great:

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1030/1140589233_e5353a7b9a.jpg?v=0

Happy shooting!
 
mfogiel said:
papasnap

This combo is my low light rig. You will get over the eye positioning thing after a day or two, for me it has become automatic. You will also get over the eye hunting for the speed display soon. Just trust the AE unless you are shooting against the sky or against a light source, and in this case use the AE lock button before. You will learn to asess the shutter speed with your ear. For the RF accuracy, point the camera at the moon, if it is OK at infinity, you are fine. I also recommend you to shoot a ruler from 1 meter distance at 45° to make sure your close focus is nailed. Before you invest in a next lens (get the Biogon if you want a better 35mm for shooting outside) get a half case - the best for this rig is Luigi's case with grip, expensive, but feels really great and the grip helps with the vertical shots - also the strap has protections for the metal rings, this way you will not consume the body around the lugs.

This combination is terribly versatile in interiors

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1074/1162454351_4ec716d14c.jpg?v=0

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2155/1794807300_0c82908851.jpg?v=0

(both of the above shots were made wide open)

but can be confidently used at f11 for zone focused street work:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2119/1794219221_a95df8e891.jpg?v=0

or at any other aperture you like for general purpose photography:

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1050/1032442528_f507681faa.jpg?v=0

Mind you - I prefer to shoot B&W, but also in colour this lens is great:

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1030/1140589233_e5353a7b9a.jpg?v=0

Happy shooting!

Wow! I like this shots ... all of them! Now with new CV 35mm f:1.4 it will be compact combo for every day 🙂 that street shot have Winogrand taste!
 
Papasnap,

Yours has been the fairest summary of the ZI I have read so far. There's the joy of ownership but it's not marred by ownership biases. Briefly owning a ZI myself, I agree with every single of your bullet points.

Enjoy your camera, it's a good one.

PS. Just to clarify, I returned the camera due to the dreaded vertical misalignement problem. And to add on what you say, of the negative things about the ZI, I was annoyed to no end by the rangefirnder patch disappearing act, which I couldn't get used to since I was using it in tandem with a couple of M's. Of the positive things, weight, viewfinder, shutter sound have all been pleasant surprises, but I mostly wanted the camera for its 1/125 flash synch speed. Still want it actually.
 
Congrats on your new setup. I purchased the exact same setup a month ago (Black Zi+35mm Nokton)

My Zi is with Dag having the rangefinder repaired. I dropped mine, but it was perfect the day I got it.

The Nokton is an awsome lens. I was using mine yesterday along with the 90mm Leica Cron on my M3 yesterday. What this lens can do at F/1.2 has cured my desire for a 50mm F/1

The 1st shot was the VC 35 Nokt on the M6TTL, and the 2nd shot was the VC Nokt on the M3 DS.
 

Attachments

  • Image73.jpg
    Image73.jpg
    256.1 KB · Views: 0
  • Image17.jpg
    Image17.jpg
    241.4 KB · Views: 0
hi again all, and thanks very much for your kind and positive comments!

I got my first roll back today (the prolab I go to has a 3 hour turnaround on E-6 developing, and charges no extra for any amount of push/pull, which is great). The results came out great, for a first roll I was suprised at overall how well the focus and exposures turned out.

The rangefinder alignment appears fine, no problems apprent at f1.2, which is a great relief to me. What is most suprising is that huge smack it got on it's first night in the brawl doesn't appear to have thrown the RF at all - the photos taken both before and after it seem fine under the loupe. I've included a quick shot showing just how twisted the hood got, to give you some idea of the force involved. I have to say this has given me a lot more confidence in the durability of the Ikon (which is good, as I don't baby my gear!). The quick photo doesn't really do proper justice to how twisted the hood got. I'll take a better one of the whole ikon (with more DOF) for a follow up post.

attachment.php


Looking at the clock, I'm afraid I've run out of time to launch into more details, when I next get time I'll go into my results in terms of metering and futher observations on working with the ikon/nokton.

Oh, and sorry to say it, but I don't have a film scanner at the moment! So I can't provide any scans yet. I'll be buying a coolscan 5000ED when I'm back from thailand/south east asia, but that won't be for a few months. Will see if I can use someone else's scanner soon.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_2906.JPG
    DSC_2906.JPG
    87.7 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
That's a good, well balanced review – it makes a pleasant change from the succession of opinions being presented as facts that we've had around here of late.

Also your party experience makes a great advert for the use of lens hoods, if not to shade lenses then at least to act as a bumper for them.
 
mr_phillip said:
Also your party experience makes a great advert for the use of lens hoods, if not to shade lenses then at least to act as a bumper for them.

yeah, you're not kidding! the vented hood served as a sort of "crumple zone", absorbing some of the shock. I'm going to definately be following up with a luigi half case before too long.

Ok, some further thoughts:

1. To the casual observer, the Ikon itself appears pretty harmless, unintimidating, and antique. Especially when the lens hood you're using is all beaten up, bent and scratched. On friday night I asked a group of (unknown) people if I could take a photo of them - one asked if I worked for a magazine, but before I could answer another said "it's fine, of course he doesn't - look at the old camera he's using", which made me grin. I view this as a definate asset. On the lens front, I think the nokton rates as neutral on the intrusion/intimidation scale - it's not particularly intimidating, nor is it particularly reassuring. It's pretty neutral, although I get asked a fair bit "is it a fisheye lens?". I adore the nokton, but I think I would like to also get a 35mm lens that was very specficially unintimidating - something very small and very "un-pro" looking, that reassured people I was just a harmless eccentric. For about the same money I could get either get the new smaller 35mm f1.4 nokton, for a bit more buy the Biogon 35mm, or for a bit less buy a replacement Hexar AF. I think I'll probably get the hexar again, as it will make a great and complimentary duo with the Ikon. The ikon offers precise control with slower operation; the hexar offers lightning speed but less precise control. Both get tremendous results when used to their best advantages.

2. The "safety catch" function of the ikon's main on/off switch seems completely indispensible to me. I'm confident the lack of this feature on the M6 would have driven me crazy - the camera is constantly getting squished around in my satchel or slung over my shoulder, i'd be getting constant blanks, or having to tie things under the shutter, which seems clumsy. It would be the camera equivalent of those unintentional calls I get from people's pockets, when they've forgotten to lock their mobile phone. On the ikon, the switch is intuitively placed right under my index finder, and has a very satisfying action to it, as a nice bonus.

3. The metering on the Ikon seems to get very reliable and predictable results, although it's clear manual intervention is required in certain situations. I think the metering pattern zeiss adopted works much better for me than what I've been used to when using mine (and other people's) DSLRs. Through trial and error i'm working on coming up with my "best practices" for quick and effective results. Judging from a small sample size (which means I might be be proven wrong by the next round of results), in general when shooting at night it appears that front-lit faces will almost always come out right with no compensation required (irrespective of what's going on in the background - whether the person is in front of a bright window or dark wall). It looks to me that side-lit faces need about plus half a stop (+0.5 stops) of compensation (ie the face appears medium underexposed), and backlight faces need about plus a full stop (+1.0 stops) or slightly more of compensation (ie the face appears highly underexposed, just a silhoutte on the slide). This might sound and be elementary to many, but these sorts of rules just didn't consistently apply with my DSLR. Hopefully these rules pan out - I've given them a shot, and will see with the 2 rolls I'm getting processed tomorrow.

4. I realised one of the major casuses of problems I was having with the RF patch dissapearing (especially after a few drinks) was that I was sometimes very carelessly putting a finger over the RF window (yeah I'm pretty clever I agree). This is actually very easy to do, as the Ikon has such a wide RF base putting the RF window over on the right near where fingers go (I imagine this is far less likely with the shorter-base Bessas), as a result the RF window sits right below the shutter dial, which is a fairly natural place to rest a finger when you want it near the shutter dial but not interfering with it. However, this habit is easy to remedy, I just need to be more mindful.


GENERAL RF COMMENTS

5. Unlike a DSLR (where anything is theoretically possible, even if it often doesn't eventuate), the clear limitations of the RF mean that I don't have as many illusions, take more responsibility for whats happening and try to adjust my mind to best exploit the capabilities that are available. If I was a photojournalist in a war zone, where the situation was more important than my preferences, I'd likely want a pro DSLR. But as an amateur, and being able to walk away from the shots I'm not suited for, it's a lot of fun to work with the RF. Both the RF and the SLR definately have their place in the world. Only time will tell whether the results I get with the RF are any better for all that extra thought & involvement. (Note: if only someone made a sort of "digital hexar AF" adding full frame digital, better manual exposure controls, higher shutter speed and ideally image stabilisation, but retaining the small size, ultra quiet operation, excellent active IR autofocus and a fixed fast compact 35mm lens, that would actually be my pick out of any type of camera for "photojournalism" type situations, like sketchy warehouse parties, street shooting and so on)


6. It's a massive plus to have every setting on the ikon + nokton visible at a glance at the top deck of the camera. A half second check can confirm all the relevant settings on the body and the lens. It's frustrating on my DSLR to quickly shoot an unexpected spontaneous photo, only to screw up the shot and spend a half minute and countless button presses & dial turns changing settings because the metering was on spot instead of centre weighted, the exposure comensation was -2 stops instead of 0, the iso was on 200 when i wanted 800, the af sensor was set to the right instead of the centre, the af assist light was off so the AF was hunting, the WB was on cloudy when it should have been auto (and I was shooting jpeg not raw) and so on.


Ok! I've run out of time. Will be back again when I have more developments.

Cheers!
Papasnap
 
papasnap said:
hola all, yesterday I recieved my brand new black zeiss ikon and new black voigtlander nokton 35mm f1.2. I'll share some of my thoughts and experiences, hopefully they may be of use/interest to someone. As it's my first proper rangefinder (an old Yashica GSN with a cloudy RF notwithstanding), some of my observations will be on rangefinders generally, and some on the ikon specifically. Sorry if this is excessively long, but I know I always want to read as much as I possibly can about others experiences and recommendations before I buy something, so I'll be as detailed as possible.

QUICK SUMMARY
I've come to very much enjoy and respect both the ikon and the nokton, they've raised quite a few challenges and issues but overall i've found the combo extremely rewarding and engaging in the short time I've had it. I think they are going to be a real asset in acheiving the kind of photography I aim to do.

BACKGROUND
I ordered the ikon from matsuiyastore in japan (http://stores.ebay.com/Matsuiyastore) and the nokton from chiif cameras in singapore (http://www.chiifcameras.com/). Both sellers were a pleasure to deal with, and I wouldn't hesitate to deal with either of them again. I live in sydney, australia and having ordered the items on last sunday, the nokton arrived on thursday and the ikon on friday.

my path to the ikon started when I read about the nokton. I shoot mostly late at night in very poor light, and in general I really dislike flash almost all of the time. When I was using my nikon DSLR (a D70s with sigma 30mm f1.4 = 45mm with the 1.5 sensor crop), I always wanted better low light capabilities and a slightly wider FOV. When I was using my Hexar AF (which I utterly loved, despite some acknowledged limitations), I would have liked a faster lens and better manual control of exposure (all it would really need would be a dedicated exposure lock button for use in AE or P modes).

Once I read about the 35mm nokton f1.2 it was clear this was the lens for me, so then I went about picking the right body to best use it. It was down to either a Leica M6 TTL (.58 or .72) or the zeiss, and I went with the zeiss for the longer rangefinder base, apperture priority mode, larger and apparently more eyeglass-friendly viewfinder, display of actual shutter speed in finder, arguably easier film loading, and the fact I can buy a brand new ZI for the same or less price than a used M6 TTL. In nearly every category I was assessing bodies in, the zeiss rated highest for me. I considered the Hexar RF as well, but discounted it as like the .58x M6 I was concerned about it's ability to focus very fast lenses (f1.2 or faster) accurately.

I've been set on the ikon and nokton for a long time, and with an impending 4 month trip to thailand, now was the time to finally get it. I'm leaving in late april, so I've got some time to get used to the system before I go.

Please keep in mind I've only had the ikon + nokton for around 24 hours, so my experience with it is still very limited. I'm 34 shots into the first roll (Provia 400X pushed one stop to 800), and haven't seen any developed results yet. On the plus side, I really put it through it's paces during this time, in particular at a hectic house party, so I've gotten a feel for it's handling and usage in difficult situations.


CHALLENGES AND ISSUES (NEGATIVES)
1. When working quickly, and particularly in poor light, I find it a challenge to keep my eye centered over the viewfinder. It happens especially when shooting with the camera vertical instead of horizontal. Due to the design of the Ikon RF, you need to keep your eye closely centred or the RF patch dissapears and you can't use it to focus. I think that this is something that will improve with time and experience.

2. I'm still not completely sure that my rangefinder is aligned, although a quick check at infinity focus seems to indicate things are on target. I'm new to rangefinders so it's hard for me to say, and I've heard that the ZI can often appear out of alignment but actually be working fine. Yesterday I ran into a acquantance/friend who's also an RFF member, and he looked through the finder and almost immediately said that the RF was out of alignment, but then checked again more carefully and wasn't so sure. When helping break up a fight at the party last night (it was pretty hectic), the ikon apparently got dropped or swung very hard into the floor or wall, which severly bent/dented the lovely LH-3 vented hood for the nokton. Hopefully that didn't mess with the alignment, I guess I'll soon see.

3. The entire RF patch has a very minor but still noticible upwards diagonal angle (just a couple of degrees off horizontal) compared to the framelines - it's like someone twisted it upwards just a little. It won't bother me in the slightest, as long as it's doesn't cause any focus innacuracy.

4. When looking through the finder while wearing glasses, I find I can't keep both the RF patch centred/visible and read the LED meter readout (on the left of the finder) at the same time. It's not a problem when I'm not wearing glasses. In time I think I'll get better at the quick shuffle repositioning my eye from one to the other, without losing my centring on the RF (see issue 1). In the mean time, i've found that when shooting very rapidly, I tend to simply have to trust the AE has the right value.

5. I'm still getting used to focusing with a rangefinder. In particular, I struggled a lot in tracking someone standing right next to me (about arms length away, near minimum focus) who is talking rapidly and moving their head around a lot in animated conversation - I found I had to wait for the moment when the person finishes what they are saying and pauses to listen to the other person, at which point they (generally) stop moving for a second or two. I'll get better in time but I think this situation is always going to be a struggle with an RF when working wide open with shallow DOF. Situations like that were a complete non-issue with the Hexar AF, with it's very quick and positive active IR focusing.



phew! Ok, that's it on negatives for now. I can't comment on the metering just yet. I plan to update this post/thread next weekend, once I've got some results back and looked at the slides under the loupe.

POSITIVES AND GENERAL COMMENTS
1. With all the fancy glass densely packed inside it, the nokton is suprisingly heavy ( in a pleasing way) for it's compact size, weighing in at about half a kilo. The build quality seems absolutely solid, and gives a sense of quality I haven't felt since trying out the big zeiss primes for my father's contax 645 system. By the way, I say compact relative to the SLR world. It's the same width but about 30 - 40% longer than my little Nikkor 50mm F1.8 AF lens, and the same length but about 40% thinner than my Sigma 30mm F1.4 AF lens (and that's not even full frame). If I hollowed out my Nikkor 18-70mm AFS zoom, I could easily fit the nokton inside it. Overall, the size of the ikon + nokton seems to be about the same (from memory) as say an old pentax spotmatic with 50mm prime lens. When the nokton is mounted on the ikon, the two together have a pleasing heft and feeling of solidity. Compared to the luxurious weight of an old leica M3 (which I've only held briefly), I think I find the weight of the ikon to be more practical.

2. This one matters a lot to me - when wearing the ikon + nokton with the standard zeiss shoulder strap, the camera sits on my body very easily and comfortably, flat against my torso. This means that I can comfortably wear the camera for extended periods without any annoyance, which in turn means I'm much more likely to have it out and ready to go when I need it at zero notice. In fact as I sit here writing this, I've got the pair over one shoulder and under the other, sitting on my stomache comfortably. This is in stark contrast to my Nikon D70S, especially when it's got the 30mm f1.4 prime on it.


3. It's a small point, but the standard shoulder strap for the ikon has a wonderfully grippy rubberised shoulder pad, that means that most of the time the camera remains sitting against your body at whatever position you left it at. This means that I can eg ride a bike while wearing it, or keep it high and close, ready to take a shot quickly. It'll be a shame to loose this if/when I get a leather half case with leather strap.

4. The Ikon and the Nokton are both a joy to look at and to hold. Neither has an especially aesthetically pleasing design, but they both look very understated, clean and functional to my eye. The black finish is very practical and handsome on both. The nokton is wonderfully tactile, and the ikon isn't far behind it. I'm planning on getting a leather half case (likely from luigi) to make holding the ikon even more comfortable, although it would be a shame to lose the sure grip you can get on the ikons rubberised body.

5. The viewfinder on the ikon is, as expected, wonderfully large and clear. The only downside to this is that it's a long way for your eye to travel from the RF patch to the metering readout, I do wish they'd put the meter readout inside the 35mm frame instead of the 28mm frame, but it's not a showstopper issue. The overall experience is definately pleasant.

6. The shutter sound is of course louder than my old virtually silent Hexar AF, but it's still very mild. It also has a reassuring sound and feel to it. I really don't think it's ever going to be a problem for me in practical use.

7. The overall ergonomics and usability of the camera rates as very intuitive and very positive. I think I'll get to grips with it very quickly and find it practical and rewarding for many many years to come. Other photographer friends/family who handle the combo are immediately impressed and get a wisftul look in their eyes.

8. Although I find the nokton extremely managable in size, I think I'll follow it up in a few months with either a voigtlander 35 f2.5 pancake II or the new 35 f1.4 nokton, or maybe even the Zeiss Biogon 35mm f2 for daytime and casual use. I don't regret getting the nokton f1.2 at all, as for my most important work there's no better substitute for it in any lens mount (canon, nikon, leica, etc).

9. The combo fits very well into my little black Domke F803 satchel, and makes for a fantastic system I can carry with me everywhere.

10. Just FYI, my next lens purchase will be a 25mm, either the zeiss or the voightlander.


Well - that's it for now. I'll have more observations to make once I've got some concrete results back. I really, really hope the alignment is correct! But even if it's not, and I have to send it back, in this short time the system has made such a positive impression on me that I'll happily wait and get it right.

If you have any questions, please let me know - keep in mind i'm likely to be slow to reply, as I'm very busy throughout the week.

Cheers!
Tom

Very loocky with your new zeiss. I,m just now looking for one. I,m in love with it even more than leica M6.
Good luck. Francisco
 
Back
Top Bottom