urban_alchemist
Well-known
Thanks... 🙂
And yes, the "til my conscience blurs" shot was out of focus on purpose. But now it looks too much out of focus, and some areas just turn into "spots": no color transition, no details, no nothing....
loan it to me for a while and i'd be pleased as punch to tell you 😀I'm still exploring new ways of using the Noctilux with the R-D1s. Please share with me if you've got any idea.
Well I WAS in Paris for the whole June. On the other hand I didn't have the Noctilux then....loan it to me for a while and i'd be pleased as punch to tell you 😀
excellent pics! i love the glow and tones of the black and whites. and the colour reminds me very much of my first version 35 Cron (1962) which kind of shocked me. mind you, i love the colour i get out of my Cron (this isn't an insult), but it is the first modern lens that comes close... cool!
@Rodluvan - I love the B/W shots. They are "real". 🙂
Rodluvan, I like the portraits ! A small question, though... In the first one I can see some "pattern" (?) in the lower right part near her face. Some kind of flare ?
Here we go ... 😉
"Standard-size" M
"Big-size" M:
It's so difficult to say! Is the diameter of the lens by the base (towards the camera body) larger than say a 50mm 'cron?
When I look at my M3 the middle window extrudes a little (a small frame) from the body making it impossible to have a larger based-diameter (I understand the mount itself is the same) mounted to it.
What's the filter diameter of that thing and what is "Standard-size" M as opposed to "Big-size" M? Are you referring to the fact that the M5 is bulkier than other other M's?
And final a (noob-) general question, are the rangefinder-lenses smaller than their slr-counterpart just because they are mounted closer to the filmplane?
Thank you for the pix!