underbyte said:
Sounds and looks too simple, it can't possibly work! Where is the hardship involved?🙂
Yeah, I know. I've been down this road before. I've actually gotten into arguments with dinosaurs who believe that there SHOULD be some pain involved in learning how to load reels, or you're not a real photographer. Seriously.
I am of the opinion that at this point, we need to attract young-uns to the film camp, not drive them away by playing the 'fetch wood, carry water' apprenticeship b.s. Those days are over. Tell the kids that they can't learn to develop film until they too have ruined a few hundred rolls of film and they'll tell you introduce it up your jaxie and return to their digicam with glee.
I get really tired of harrumphing old smell-pots that can't figure out that ruining film trying to stuff it into a reel is not a skill that makes one a better photographer. It's simply one of those rites of passage whose time has come and gone, and they need to get over it.
The aprons DO have a couple of drawbacks. One is, even the original Kodak tanks would only hold two rolls of 35mm film, and one roll of 127 or 120/620. So it is definitely for the small-scale developer, not a lab or a guy who shoots a couple dozen rolls at a go. For them, I can see why they'd want the deep tank or the nikor reels, etc.
The second drawback is you have to agitate a tad more frequently with the aprons to prevent them from having uneven development. Not a huge deal. Like I've got something else to do while my negs are souping.
Other than that, they're so easy, I am disgusted with myself for messing a roll up recently.