deepwhite
Well-known
I'm not a professional photographer or reviewer; I'm just someone that like to share.
That's why I say it's a "trivial" diary of me and the E-P1.
------
[Point-and-Shoot]
I only bought the 17/2.8 lens. I mainly use RF cameras, so zoom and tele lenses are really not that necessary for me.
I thought this one would be a "compact DSLR". After spending one day with it, however, I was quite surprised to find that, most of the photos I shot with the E-P1 are very similar to those I would with the GRD2 or TC-1, small point-and-shoots.
- The AF speed is decent; yet I would like the powering-on time to be a bit shorter (as much as I know it's shaking off the dusts).
- 34mm equivalent is great for someone that's been using an RF like me.
- The settings are less convenient than my beloved GRD2, but after using it for awhile, it's not hard to make quick adjustments.
- It's easy to shoot successfully @ 1/8sec with the 17/2.8.
My only complaints would be that, when set to auto-iso, the E-P1 turns to high-iso (like 1250 or 1600) too easily: it does that even when the shutter speed is still as fast as 1/60sec! Considering I can shoot with comfort at 1/15sec, it really makes no sense for this camera to turn to high iso that easily.
(Of course you can set it up so that the camera would not go above iso640, but I just think that the camera does not believe in itself as much as I do....)
[ISO1600]
So how's ISO1600? I didn't shoot too many iso1600 on purpose, since I've been using the E-P1 instead of testing it. Here's one, JPG straight out of the camera:
I would say it's decent, if not bad. Yet playing with the curve in photoshop a little bit, it can still look ok:
[Born Under?]
After one day of shooting with the E-P1, I found that most of the JPGs looked under-exposed and not enough contrasy. Therefore I set the EV to +0.7 all the time (with the default metering mode), and the contrast setting in the camera menu to +2 (max).
Everything looks more "like it" after that.
- to be continued
That's why I say it's a "trivial" diary of me and the E-P1.
------
[Point-and-Shoot]
I only bought the 17/2.8 lens. I mainly use RF cameras, so zoom and tele lenses are really not that necessary for me.
I thought this one would be a "compact DSLR". After spending one day with it, however, I was quite surprised to find that, most of the photos I shot with the E-P1 are very similar to those I would with the GRD2 or TC-1, small point-and-shoots.
- The AF speed is decent; yet I would like the powering-on time to be a bit shorter (as much as I know it's shaking off the dusts).
- 34mm equivalent is great for someone that's been using an RF like me.
- The settings are less convenient than my beloved GRD2, but after using it for awhile, it's not hard to make quick adjustments.
- It's easy to shoot successfully @ 1/8sec with the 17/2.8.
My only complaints would be that, when set to auto-iso, the E-P1 turns to high-iso (like 1250 or 1600) too easily: it does that even when the shutter speed is still as fast as 1/60sec! Considering I can shoot with comfort at 1/15sec, it really makes no sense for this camera to turn to high iso that easily.
(Of course you can set it up so that the camera would not go above iso640, but I just think that the camera does not believe in itself as much as I do....)
[ISO1600]
So how's ISO1600? I didn't shoot too many iso1600 on purpose, since I've been using the E-P1 instead of testing it. Here's one, JPG straight out of the camera:
I would say it's decent, if not bad. Yet playing with the curve in photoshop a little bit, it can still look ok:
[Born Under?]
After one day of shooting with the E-P1, I found that most of the JPGs looked under-exposed and not enough contrasy. Therefore I set the EV to +0.7 all the time (with the default metering mode), and the contrast setting in the camera menu to +2 (max).
Everything looks more "like it" after that.
- to be continued