TVphotog
Television Grunt
A friend here at work brought me this lens. He found it in a pawn shop. It looks to me to be an LTM lens that was converted at some point in its life to some sort of bayonet mount. It is any early lens(maybe) I only guess this because some of my earliest Nikon lenses 1961ish and such notate the length in CM like this one. That is all I can gather. Your help would be appreciated. And No, right now it is not for sale
Here are some pics to help
Lens in all its glory
Lens name and length, sorry for the lack of focus these were shot really quick and dirty.
Lens serial number, don't know if this will help. It usually does with Nikon and FSU lenses
Lastly, the mount. Not being familiar with the M mount, is this what it is??
Thanks for the help guys
Ken
Here are some pics to help
Lens in all its glory

Lens name and length, sorry for the lack of focus these were shot really quick and dirty.

Lens serial number, don't know if this will help. It usually does with Nikon and FSU lenses

Lastly, the mount. Not being familiar with the M mount, is this what it is??

Thanks for the help guys
Ken
Xmas
Veteran
Have you tried unscrewing the bayonet mount?
Noel
Noel
colyn
ישו משיח
The M-mount is a screw to M adapter. It will screw off.
This mount will let you use a screw mount Leica lens on the Leica M mount cameras.
This mount will let you use a screw mount Leica lens on the Leica M mount cameras.
TVphotog
Television Grunt
Cool, I will go try this. I found a place on the internet that dated the lens. Pre-1933 is what it claimed. Does this sound right?
TIA
Ken
TIA
Ken
Xmas
Veteran
Should say Hektor somewhere...
Noel
Noel
TVphotog
Television Grunt
Okay, the mount does not unscrew. There are 3 screws very close together just foward of the mount. The body of the lens also includes a tripod mount. Could some one have removed the rear of the lens and had it modified so as to only work on M mount cameras?
TVphotog
Television Grunt
I do not see hektor anywhere, but I will go look some more.
TVphotog
Television Grunt
The three screws appear to be connected to a long bar which would accuate the rangefinder cam inside the camera body. It almost appears that the collar between the mount and where I can see the helical inside the lens could be removed. I don't know if that is actually the case or not.
colyn
ישו משיח
TVphotog said:I do not see hektor anywhere, but I will go look some more.
Not all early (pre-1933) Hektors were labeled as such..
Take an old rag and wrap it around the mount and twist counterclockwise. It may be tight but should come off. The screws you mentioned in a previous post do not have to be removed..
erikhaugsby
killer of threads
"Elmar 13.5cm f/4.5" is visible in the first image, so I'd doubt that "Hektor" would appear anywhere else.
I'm not sure why there seems to be a serial number on the M-mount. Did Leica ever do this?
Maybe someone super glued the mount to the lens?
I'm not sure why there seems to be a serial number on the M-mount. Did Leica ever do this?
Maybe someone super glued the mount to the lens?
colyn
ישו משיח
erikhaugsby said:"Elmar 13.5cm f/4.5" is visible in the first image.
I missed that. It is an early Elmar.
erikhaugsby said:I'm not sure why there seems to be a serial number on the M-mount. Did Leica ever do this?
That's the part number of the screw to M adapter..
erikhaugsby said:Maybe someone super glued the mount to the lens?
Only a dim wit would do that...but the would is full of dim wits...
TVphotog
Television Grunt
Okay, the mount does unscrew, I just can't do it right now. Also, the F-stops are strange. 4.5; 6.3; 9; 12.5; 18; 25 and 36. Okay, with a little bit of persistance, a really big wrench and a small bit of oil, the mount came off. It is a screwmount lens. Now for the really big question. The iris blades are a bit 'off' Is this a hard fix? Looks like one has 'jumped the track' for lack of a better term.
Xmas
Veteran
It may be a bit tight.
Noel
Noel
colyn
ישו משיח
According to my book this lens was introduced in 1931 and had a production run of approx. 5,200 total before the Hektor was introduced.
My personal experience with this lens is it is a bit low in contrast but does a lot better stopped down to f/5.6-8.
I trade mine several years ago for a coated f/4 Elmar which is a far better lens..
My personal experience with this lens is it is a bit low in contrast but does a lot better stopped down to f/5.6-8.
I trade mine several years ago for a coated f/4 Elmar which is a far better lens..
bob cole
Well-known
Need some help with lens ID please
You've Lucked Out...the Cap And The Sm To M-mount Adapter Are Worth Close To $100 Usd...the Lens Is Worth, Depending On Condition, Very Little To Maybe $40-50 Usd...that's Assuming That The Cap And The Adapter Are Made By Leitz And Are In Good Condition...
You've Lucked Out...the Cap And The Sm To M-mount Adapter Are Worth Close To $100 Usd...the Lens Is Worth, Depending On Condition, Very Little To Maybe $40-50 Usd...that's Assuming That The Cap And The Adapter Are Made By Leitz And Are In Good Condition...
colyn
ישו משיח
TVphotog said:Okay, the mount does unscrew, I just can't do it right now. Also, the F-stops are strange. 4.5; 6.3; 9; 12.5; 18; 25 and 36.
These were pre-war f/stops..
TVphotog said:Now for the really big question. The iris blades are a bit 'off' Is this a hard fix? Looks like one has 'jumped the track' for lack of a better term.
The lens head will unscrew from the focus mount. Then unscrew both front and rear elements. Referring to the below photo you will see pins in slots. See if you can find one out of its slot and carefully work it back into the slot. If the pin is broken..the lens is a shelf decoration unless you can find a replacement.

TVphotog
Television Grunt
The cap and the adapter are made by Leitz. The cap even still has the nice leather ring on the inside to hold it on to the lens. The mount is marked 'Ernst Leitz GmbH Wetzlar Germany DBP' with 13.5 cm stamped on the opposite side. The iris blade problem does not look that hard to fix. I may do it tonight and play with the lens some tomorrow
The pins are fine. One had just come out of the slot. I did notice that one of blades appears to be out of alignment. I may try to fix that. I am not sure yet.
Thanks Guys
Ken
The pins are fine. One had just come out of the slot. I did notice that one of blades appears to be out of alignment. I may try to fix that. I am not sure yet.
Thanks Guys
Ken
Last edited:
Xmas
Veteran
I have a bad tendance to remove the errant blades, some iris will work happily with reduced blade counts.
Noel
Noel
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.