My Fujica ST 901's meter was EV -3 to 18, which was 20 seconds at f/1.4 to 1/1000 at f/16 with ASA 25 film. EV 5 to 17 has to be a mistake, or a different ISO or something.
These camera bodies are needed. The reason is that so many (if not most) classic SLR's need repair work to get them into reasonably good shape to be day-in day-out shooters. For instance the light seals usually need replacing and the meters typically need to be recalibrated for alkaline batteries. Doing all of this as well as a general CLA as well is expensive, and unless one wants a nice collectible, a new modern camera body is a useful alternative.
In response to another post above, Kenko is a respected Japanese optical firm.
I personally welcome these interesting cameras to the hobby/profession.
It looks like a cross between a Kiev and a Pentax. Now what in the world convinced them that we need a film camera like this? My old Nikon 8008s was twice the camera (and twice the top shutter speed) of these, and I was lucky to sell it for 27 bucks last week on eBay. So I wonder if there is a market for these things.
Todays tech. makes possible things that weren´t in the past, so why keep repeating the same thing over and over again?
If they could rethink the reflex body to use an M mount on them, that would be a revolution, that leica couldn´t do at its time, because their technology wasn´t so developed as cosina,s todays tech. That would be a new product that everybody would want!
A refex M.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.