New Leica Q2

Yeah, well even at that price I still won't be joining the crowd. I hit my enthusiasm peak yesterday, now the truck is having another fit, so I'll be putting camera funds into getting it fixed. But one can dream...or hit the Lottery.


PF
 
After sleeping on this, I’m going to pass on a Q2 for now and probably in total. I really would prefer an ILC version with an EVF. It may never happen...

For me right now, a Nikon Z is shaping up to be a better choice for a digital platform to use my M lenses.
 
For me right now, a Nikon Z is shaping up to be a better choice for a digital platform to use my M lenses.
If you can wait a couple of months, the rumor is the SL2 will be announced in June. M lenses are likely to perform better on it than the Z if the lore is correct.
 
I favor using 50mm and 35mm lenses in most of my photography, and I don't think that I will even think about getting a Q or Q2. Fixed lens cameras make more sense to me when they are small and light and used when sharp snapshots are needed at times when and where a full size camera may be less suitable. I am still with the old M8 and M9 cameras, while I stay interested in getting additional lenses, because they are fun to try out and explore.
Still, if you want to downsize to one Leica camera with one lens and at a cost that is lower than getting an M10 with a Summicron or Summilux and if a 28mm view is OK for you, then the Q2 could be a suitable choice. When needed, you could crop.
 
After sleeping on this, I’m going to pass on a Q2 for now and probably in total. I really would prefer an ILC version with an EVF. It may never happen...

For me right now, a Nikon Z is shaping up to be a better choice for a digital platform to use my M lenses.

I have the Z7, and my M lenses work far better on my M240.
I wish that wasn't so, which pretty much was the reason I bought the Z7.
I now kinda wish I kept my D850.
 
Still, if you want to downsize to one Leica camera with one lens and at a cost that is lower than getting an M10 with a Summicron or Summilux and if a 28mm view is OK for you, then the Q2 could be a suitable choice. When needed, you could crop.

That sums it up precisely for me plus the option of AF.
I use a Richo GR and have a 28 Summicron ASPH so 28 is fine as a F/L.
 
That Q2 sure looks and sounds lovely. I look forward to seeing all the images that you guys and gals will be posting here.

Unfortunately I am a very slow learner.

I am still trying to get the most out of my M-A, Lux 50 and HP5+.

Judging by my most recent prints it will be awhile before I will be buying anything digital.

Beside, I just blew my stash on more 11x14 paper. 😱
 
That Q2 sure looks and sounds lovely. I look forward to seeing all the images that you guys and gals will be posting here.

Unfortunately I am a very slow learner.

I am still trying to get the most out of my M-A, Lux 50 and HP5+.

Judging by my most recent prints it will be awhile before I will be buying anything digital.

Beside, I just blew my stash on more 11x14 paper. 😱

A kindred spirit!
 
I recently spoke of my desire, in a post on a thread hat RFF, to upgrade my Leica M8 by buying an M240 due to its advantages in sensor technology and all this confers, plus its live view ability etc.

But something happened on the way to the camera store. Or at the camera store more precisely. I had the chance to handle a pristine Leica Q. Long story short, I am now he proud owner of a new Leica Q. What I think really did it for me was auto focus (super quick and accurate) and my realization that while I enjoy MF using a rangefinder in principle (ahh they sure don't make nostalgia like they used to) my eyes are unlikely to get any better and in fact are likely to go the other way as is my ability to hand hold and extract usable images from a non image stabilized body. (I think I feel a little about rangefinders cameras the same way I feel about my sex life as I get older - memories, memories.) 😉

While I had some trepidation about a 28mm fixed lens camera given my predilection for longer lenses I have found it actually works well. And oh, my God that 28mm f1.7 lens !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! For me it renders not perhaps like any Leica glass I have ever used and is more reminiscent of the Zeiss glass that was to be found on my old Contax T2 which was super - contrasty and oh so sharp. This Leica lens has those advantages plus that of having of surprisingly good bokeh - given it is a 28mm lens.

Match the above to a beautiful and traditional looking body, a superbly competent and quick AF system and a fairly simple yet functional menu system (thank you Leica - having used the monstrosities prevalent in other systems, thank you, thank you, thank you) and you have the makings of a superb camera.

The only thing I could think of to make it better would be to have Leica double the pixel count on the sensor. Oh, wait a minute, they have and they have called it a Leica Q 2. While I am not a pixel glutton, for me the real benefit of the huge sensor is the ability to crop images (in camera if you wish) to say, a 75mm equivalent field of view while retaining a workable pixel count in the final image. Then I could say for sure - Tele lens? I don't need no stinkin' tele lens! 😀

As for now - I am happy with the Q. In fact ecstatic. But one day....one day, a Q2 might just be on the cards in a few years when the price drops enough. Seriously if the Q2 is as good as the first model (and I have no reason to think it will not be) then the owners of this camera will be very happy chappies and ladies. When I was considering if to actually lay down that much money I did read every review I could lay my hands on and I struggled to find any negative comments or even reservations. I believe that will carry over into the new camera as well.
 
Show us soon some results from your Q, Peter.

I will do Raid. Just as soon as I have a chance to make a few at least semi serious shots.

I am particularly interested to see how it performs in the high ISO and Dynamic Range departments. So far I have not had any chance to assess these but the color rendering, sharpness and contrast all look excellent on the rear LCD.
 
If you can wait a couple of months, the rumor is the SL2 will be announced in June. M lenses are likely to perform better on it than the Z if the lore is correct.

I have the Z7, and my M lenses work far better on my M240.
I wish that wasn't so, which pretty much was the reason I bought the Z7.
I now kinda wish I kept my D850.

I’m definitely not a candidate for a SL2 - I’m primarily a Nikon shooter, so the Z makes sense for me.

Huss, what issues are you having with M lenses? I’m looking at a Z6 if it matters.
 
Peter congrats on the "new" Leica Q, hope you'll continue to like it. I've had my Q for less than a year now and it has found considerable favor. (see my RFF Gallery if you wish, back a few months). And the Q2 looks really excellent...

As you say, there comes a time when autofocus and image stabilization become more attractive features! The one annoyance I've faced is the video button getting accidentally activated... I went almost two days shooting on vacation before I realized I was taking short videos every time I pressed the shutter release.🙄😱
 
Peter congrats on the "new" Leica Q, hope you'll continue to like it. I've had my Q for less than a year now and it has found considerable favor. (see my RFF Gallery if you wish, back a few months). And the Q2 looks really excellent...

As you say, there comes a time when autofocus and image stabilization become more attractive features! The one annoyance I've faced is the video button getting accidentally activated... I went almost two days shooting on vacation before I realized I was taking short videos every time I pressed the shutter release.🙄😱

Thanks Doug. I will post a few early test shots from my Q here shortly. Ouch to your experience with video shooting. I have once or twice done something the same with video buttons though not on this new camera (yet) and I have had the comparatively good fortune of realizing it quickly enough to undo the damage. However I must here fess up that the worst experience I ever had was with a Nikonos 5, which I bought immediately before a diving / sailing holiday around Melanesia back in the late 1980s. Every roll was improperly loaded by me resulting in 20 rolls of nothing for that trip. At least I can write that off to me being a complete newbie and looking on the bright side, my processing costs were zero. Though it did cost me the price of a repeat holiday to the same location the next year (which however, I did not mind one bit).
 
Back
Top Bottom